Object

Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries

Representation ID: 60601

Received: 15/12/2013

Respondent: Mr Graham Bamford

Representation Summary:

The reason given for selecting site 1 and not site 3 as the preferred option is absurd. It is not sufficient to say that WCC Highways Dept have access concerns with site 3, when it is obvious to everyone that access to the land off Oakdene Crescent is far worse, being a narrow entrance, with existing parking and safety problems which will worsen with more houses. There is I believe much support for this view.

Full text:

The reason given for selecting site 1 and not site 3 as the preferred option is absurd. It is not sufficient to say that WCC Highways Dept have access concerns with site 3, when it is obvious to everyone that access to the land off Oakdene Crescent is far worse, being a narrow entrance, with existing parking and safety problems which will worsen with more houses. There is I believe much support for this view.