Yes

ID sylw: 104174

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Clare Kimpton

Na

Yes

ID sylw: 104349

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Norrie

This would allow some areas to the south of Stratford to receive green-belt type designations, which would be useful in counter-balancing the bias against development in the north imposed by the over-extensive green belt allocations.

Yes

ID sylw: 104397

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Rachel Pope

In recent years the gaps between Coventry, Kenilworth and Leamington have narrowed considerably. Designating this gap an 'Area of Restraint' would ensure that the open nature is preserved and that the purposes of the green belt are maintained. It would have an opposite, positive effect to that of possible development in SGs 1-6. SG06 in particular is agricultural land with leisure benefits offered by the rural footpaths. It therefore has demonstrable community benefits as well as visual amenity and food production benefits. It also contributes greatly to the character of the settlements of Old Milverton and Blackdown.

Yes

ID sylw: 104567

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 104722

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton

_

Yes

ID sylw: 104892

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Susan Hood

Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Housing allocations should not be on Green Belt.

Yes

ID sylw: 104907

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Ann Colley

agree

No

ID sylw: 105308

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Other

ID sylw: 106676

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Property and Development Group

Asiant : Framptons

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 106904

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Historic England

Areas of Restraint are potentially a mechanism for protecting areas that contribute positively to heritage assets or well-preserved historic settlements. For example, where a settlement has a good medieval settlement form, the surrounding fields may contain further evidence of medieval settlement or associated field system. We therefore welcome the clarity that they will seek to protect areas that make an important contribution to the character of the settlement.

We also welcome that this policy is proposed to be consistent across both Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick districts.

No

ID sylw: 106988

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes

Asiant : Savills

We object to draft Policy Direction 45 as it is not supported by sufficient evidence to designate Areas of Restraint. We also note that further evidence is being produced to inform the landscape character of sites and is expected to be published with the Regulation 19. It is unclear whether new areas of restraint are being proposed in Warwick District and where these will be located. Therefore, the draft policy is not considered to be justified, as required in NPPF paragraph 36.

Yes

ID sylw: 107089

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswolds National Landscape Board

Yes, the Cotswolds National Landscape (CNL) Board agrees with the approach outlined in Draft Policy Direction 45.
In the context of settlements in the CNL, this policy approach could help to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the CNL. For settlements in the setting of the CNL, it could help to protect views looking towards the CNL (particularly views that feature the Cotswold escarpment and / or escarpment outliers).

Other

ID sylw: 107190

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Again, it is not clear how areas of restraint will differ from certain other forms of control identified elsewhere in the proposed DPDs or wider planning legislation, such as Local Green Spaces, conservation areas, open space networks and in the case of Warwick, green belt. Justification for its implementation should be made very clear in the policy along with an indication of support from national planning guidance and a robust justification based on how it will differ from other forms of local amenity protection.

Yes

ID sylw: 107392

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust

Yes, in principle. Although it isn’t clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, GI corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations; and if reviewed should include more comprehensive assessments, and an option in the SA of ‘no housing in the green belt’ too.

No

ID sylw: 107765

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land

Asiant : Savills

We object to draft Policy Direction 45 as it is not supported by sufficient evidence to designate Areas of Restraint. We also note that further evidence is being produced to inform the landscape character of sites and is expected to be published with the Regulation 19. It is unclear whether new areas of restraint are being proposed in Warwick District and where these will be located. Therefore, the draft policy is not considered to be justified, as required in NPPF paragraph 36.

Other

ID sylw: 107868

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Designated Areas of Restraint already exist within Stratford District; these seek to protect areas that make an important contribution to the character of a settlement. A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint, and whether they are needed as a policy designation, needs to be carried out to provide the evidence for a justified policy.

If Areas of Restraint are retained/designated, the policy should be clearer that these would not restrict development, as stated in the supporting justification, and that residential development of an appropriate design and scale would be permissible within them, providing that they do not harm the Area of Restraint, and subject to compliance with other development plan policies.

Other

ID sylw: 107987

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rainier Developments Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Designated Areas of Restraint already exist within Stratford District; these seek to protect areas that make an important contribution to the character of a settlement. A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint, and whether they are needed as a policy designation, needs to be carried out to provide the evidence for a justified policy.

If Areas of Restraint are retained/designated, the policy should be clearer that these would not restrict development, as stated in the supporting justification, and that residential development of an appropriate design and scale would be permissible within them, providing that they do not harm the Area of Restraint, and subject to compliance with other development plan policies.

Other

ID sylw: 108098

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Seven Homes

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Designated Areas of Restraint already exist within Stratford District; these seek to protect areas that make an important contribution to the character of a settlement. A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint, and whether they are needed as a policy designation, needs to be carried out to provide the evidence for a justified policy.

If Areas of Restraint are retained/designated, the policy should be clearer that these would not restrict development, as stated in the supporting justification, and that residential development of an appropriate design and scale would be permissible within them, providing that they do not harm the Area of Restraint, and subject to compliance with other development plan policies.

No

ID sylw: 108241

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Persimmon Homes (South Midlands)

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Designated Areas of Restraint already exist within Stratford District; these seek to protect areas that make an important contribution to the character of a settlement. A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint, and whether they are needed as a policy designation, needs to be carried out to provide the evidence for a justified policy.

If Areas of Restraint are retained/designated, the policy should be clearer that these would not restrict development, as stated in the supporting justification, and that residential development of an appropriate design and scale would be permissible within them, providing that they do not harm the Area of Restraint, and subject to compliance with other development plan policies.

Other

ID sylw: 108256

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sovereign Man Simon of the family Thomas

Policy Direction 45 - Areas of Restraint
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 45- Areas of Restraint?
Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

No

ID sylw: 108291

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Spitfire Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

No. The areas of restraint are local landscape designations. There is no provision in the NPPF for the inclusion of local landscape designations in Local Plans. Paragraph 187a of the NPPF requires planning polices to protect and enhance “valued” landscapes only. The guidance in Section 15 of the NPPF is adequate to deal with local landscape matters.

No

ID sylw: 108603

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Designated Areas of Restraint already exist within Stratford District; these seek to protect areas that make an important contribution to the character of a settlement. A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint, and whether they are needed as a policy designation, needs to be carried out to provide the evidence for a justified policy.

If Areas of Restraint are retained/designated, the policy should be clearer that these would not restrict development, as stated in the supporting justification, and that residential development of an appropriate design and scale would be permissible within them, providing that they do not harm the Area of Restraint, and subject to compliance with other development plan policies.

Other

ID sylw: 108647

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kiely Bros Holdings Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Policy Direction 45 – Areas of Restraint
10.18.
Designated Areas of Restraint already exist within Stratford District; these seek to protect areas that make an important contribution to the character of a settlement. A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint, and whether they are needed as a policy designation, needs to be carried out to provide the evidence for a justified policy.
10.19.
If Areas of Restraint are retained/designated, the policy should be clearer that these would not restrict development, as stated in the supporting justification, and that residential development of an appropriate design and scale would be permissible within them, providing that they do not harm the Area of Restraint, and subject to compliance with other development plan policies.