BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-45- Areas of Restraint?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86144
Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86956
Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
There does not seem to be any restraint re quite a few areas of Stratford-upon-Avon rapidly declining into dereliction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87106
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: S Gardner
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87114
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Steph Johnson
I appreciate the intent of Draft Policy Direction-45 to protect Areas of Restraint but have concerns about sites such as B1 - Land at Hatton /Site 160's development, which I believe may be an example of the above area. This site is crucial for maintaining the area's character and biodiversity. Instead of development, I suggest compensating landowners through conservation incentives or sustainable land use practices. These alternatives align with the policy's objectives and enhance community well-being. By exploring these creative solutions, we can balance development needs with preserving our cherished landscapes. Thank you.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87130
Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Tony Hughes
:"People need to have 'access to a network of high quality open spaces' which 'reflect current and future needs and support communities health, social and cultural wellbeing'. Proposed development Gaydon23/01054/OUT will be totally at odds with this very necessary restraint on air/noise polluting, environmentally-negative (esp. flooding) that this development will bring. Up to 55 lorry movements per hour (developer's figure) will affect an area already polluted. The position , on elevated agricultural land, will project noise, air and the real threat of flooding (n.b.2007) from run-off (concretised area), sewage overload because of the sealing of existing , absorbent ground.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87439
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day
None
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87614
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
I agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88856
Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown
This policy should prevent your very own SG23, as an example. If SG23 achieved its full intent it would ruin the landscape and character of a most important and historical town. The council has a duty of care to show that areas can be retained to keep its charm, characteristics and history intact especially when other areas more suited to location and connectivity to major transport routes. I will be intrigued if you apply this restraint policy to such an example.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89110
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
this is where Neighbourhood plans are essential. There should be more reference to the guidance neighbourhood plans should give on this and all areas
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89155
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth
the areas propoed for development in Alcester should all be kept as green belt areas and not built on
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89227
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanna Hughes
The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open
landscape, nature conservation and has the potential for food production this makes it grade 3 which is the most Versatile Agricultural Land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89296
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jon Knight
Given the historic nature and tourist potential of many places in both Stratford and Warwick districts, having areas of restraint would seem like a good idea. I wouldn't want to see Anne Hathway's cottage have McDonalds open next door to it, or Warwick Castle get a modern office block tacked on next door.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89651
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Simon Cook
I agree in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89880
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Emily Buxton-Woodcock
Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations. Stop destroying our planet.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89912
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Stephen Browett
I agree with the sentiment but am concerned with the lack on detail on this point.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89935
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr O Johnson
It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90030
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Fiona Macvie
The greenbelt are of Clopton Quarter of SG18 should be considered an area of restraint for open green space, wildlife conservation, agriculture - it is high quality farmland - essential for sea sufficiency in secure food supplies.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90074
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson
It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90127
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: L B
If Areas of Restraint in Stratford are to be reviewed, community consultation is essential for the area.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90226
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Williams
The greenbelt of Clopton Quarter in SG18 should be identified area of restraint for open landscape, nature & has the potential for food production being grade 3 best & most versatile agricultural land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90285
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Maria Giblin
The green belt land of Clopton Quarter SG18 should be identified as an area of restraint for open landscape nature conservation and has the potential for food production being grade 3 best and most versatile agricultural land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90287
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Giblin
The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be identified as an area of restraint for open landscape and nature conservation. It also has significant potential for food production, being classified as grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land. This land plays a crucial role in preserving the natural environment and contributing to sustainable agriculture.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90321
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Liz Stone
Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90345
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Julia Gibson
Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90460
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheetal Tailor
The greenbelt land of Clopton quarter in SG18 should be identified as an area of restraint for open landscape and nature conservation. Also it has the potential for food production (being grade 3 Best and most versatile agricultural land).
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90526
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart
Wilmcote / Pathlow / Bearley should be considered as areas of restraint. They are unsuitable for building due to the agricultural designation, conservation area in Wilmcote, grade 1 listed building Mary Arden’s farm and also important evidence starting from the Bronze Age and mentioned specifically in the Domesday Book. There is also me requirement for anything also mentioned such as educational leisure or recreational development, the natural landscape provides this already.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90563
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Gavin Simpson
SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open landscape. Grade 3 soil should be utilised for food, not housing. Sustain the wild life, not the bank accounts of the developers.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90606
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Pack
Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90688
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Littlewood
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90758
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Goodwin
The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open landscape, nature conservation and has the potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.