Yes

ID sylw: 98704

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ginny White

I agree as long as this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn't include housing allocations.

Yes

ID sylw: 98821

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Old Milverton and Blackdown Parish Council

Land in between Kenilworth, Coventry and North Leamington would benefit from being designated an Area of Restraint. Developments over the last five years have led to the gap narrowing considerably. Designating it an Area of Restraint would ensure that the open nature is preserved and that the purposes of the green belt here are maintained. It would have an opposite, positive effect to that of possible development in SGs 1-6. SG06 in particular is agricultural land with leisure benefits offered by the rural footpaths. It therefore meets the criteria outlined in the draft policy.

Yes

ID sylw: 98895

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Friends of Radfords Green Environment (FORGE)

It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

ID sylw: 99077

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council

Support

Yes

ID sylw: 99215

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

11.10, 11.11, 11.12 and 11.13 all refer to designated areas with slightly different objectives and protection regimes. The final policies need to be clear as to the exact definitions in each case and to ensure there are no overlaps and contradictions. Too much complexity will be difficult for developers to address and may make it difficult for planning officers and planning committees to come to reasonable decisions. While there is clearly a need for enhanced protection of certain areas outside those covered in 11.1 it is important to avoid over-engineering the policies.

No

ID sylw: 99337

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

No. The areas of restraint are local landscape designations. There is no provision in the NPPF for the inclusion of local landscape designations in Local Plans. Paragraph 187a of the NPPF requires planning polices to protect and enhance “valued” landscapes only. The guidance in Section 15 of the NPPF is adequate to deal with local landscape matters.

Yes

ID sylw: 99685

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

Yes

ID sylw: 99688

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

Other

ID sylw: 99996

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Dunster

I agree with the Policy Direction of Areas of Restraint and the extension to Warwick, however I do not see the need to review the existing areas within Stratford, these have been agreed and I see no justification to change them.
I also don't agree with the exemption of "unless the scheme has demonstrable community benefits and contributes significantly the Local Plan's core objectives" this is very vague and could be misused to open up these protected areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 100062

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting

Areas of Restraint makes sense

No

ID sylw: 100102

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Welford on Avon Parish Council

THis policy is goo but needs to be more specfic and define what an area of restraint is !! ie: conservation areas and village views and vistas etc etc

Yes

ID sylw: 100455

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Parsons

I absolutely agree with the approach laid out

Yes

ID sylw: 100498

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

The greenbelt area of the Lower Clopton quarter in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open landscape, nature conservation and food production.

Yes

ID sylw: 100556

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Newbould

na

No

ID sylw: 100858

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Judy Steele

as suggested by my local environment group: It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

No

ID sylw: 100930

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

No. The areas of restraint are local landscape designations. There is no provision in the NPPF for the inclusion of local landscape designations in Local Plans. Paragraph 187a of the NPPF requires planning polices to protect and enhance “valued” landscapes only. The guidance in Section 15 of the NPPF is adequate to deal with local landscape matters.

Other

ID sylw: 101292

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr H Farmer

Draft Policy Direction 4's proposal to review Areas of Restraint and allow development for "community benefits" fundamentally undermines their protective purpose. AORs were specifically designated to preserve important open spaces and local character. Experience shows that "review" typically leads to weakening protections, while "community benefits" exceptions create dangerous precedents. Once an AOR's integrity is compromised by development, however small, it becomes increasingly difficult to resist further erosion. The cumulative impact of multiple "community benefit" developments could irreversibly damage these valuable open spaces.

No

ID sylw: 101752

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Other

ID sylw: 101887

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

No opinion at this stage

A study to review and identify Areas of Restraint across South Warwickshire needs to be undertaken to help inform the designations before we can comment on the relevance of this suggestion

Yes

ID sylw: 101968

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs AMANDA VENABLES

Areas of Restraint should be retained to protect important landscapes

Yes

ID sylw: 102045

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Heart of England Forest

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

ID sylw: 102054

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Isabel Collins

The greenbelt land of Clopton Quarter in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open landscape

Yes

ID sylw: 102061

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Walkden

With regard to Clopton Quarter and the green belt including existing productive farmland, the incumbent wildlife and general landscape, this should be set apart as an area of restraint

Yes

ID sylw: 103618

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jenny Stevens

The greenbelt land bordering the Clopton Quarter identified as an area of restraint -wildlife and nature conservation

Other

ID sylw: 103669

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs S Farmer

Areas of Restraint are a necessary safeguard, as they flag up areas that have already had careful consideration. Of course developers would prefer not to have them as it’s one less thing to challenge.

I do not agree with a review of the Areas of Restraint as I question the motives in my longer reply. Respect previous decisions and put the time into regenerating brownfield areas.

The proposed policy is conveniently vague - it seeks to ensure no harm to identified areas unless there are ‘community benefits’ and it contributes to ‘core objectives’. See longer response.

Yes

ID sylw: 103852

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: H Crook

These areas are very important to protect., and once gone are permanently lost.

These need to include not building or putting any development on flood plains.

This must include caravan sites, static van sites etc

They protect areas that are at high risk from developers.

Yes

ID sylw: 103859

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth White

Please consider BIODIVERSITY-RICH HISTORICAL SITE H03 and the wider area Broad Location ‘Whitnash’= rural Radford Semele:

WHITNASH/RADFORD BROOK

BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN – including RED LIST

GRADE 2 AGRICULTURAL LAND

‘REGIA VIA INTER RADEFORD ET WYTENAS 1285’ = BRIDLEWAY W119 = ‘Greenfield Road’
is at the head of an extensive network of public Bridleways and Footpaths that run down through rural Radford Semele - these ANCIENT PATHS are well-used and much loved

WHITNASH HOLY WELL [MWA7390],

CASTLE HILL FIELD [MWA8287]

RADFORD ROMAN VILLA [MWA1905],

SUGGESTION OF ‘BUILDING A HISTORICAL CENTRE AND MUSEUM CLOSE BY’...

PORTABLE ANTIQUITIES SCHEME FINDS


-OLD MILVERTON

Yes

ID sylw: 104008

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Amarjit Gill

The green belt of the Clopton quarter of SG18 should be preserved for its open landscape, nature conservation and potential for grade 3 land for food production

Yes

ID sylw: 104013

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Camille Newton

In principal this sounds like a good approach to be rolled out across Warwick District as well Stratford District.

Yes

ID sylw: 104139

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Margaret Halligan

Agree