No

ID sylw: 96265

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Burgess

No such thing as sustainable growth or development.
No evidence from existing developments that the planning infrastructure is able to promote or even influence good design.
There is no mention of preserving or enhancing our town centres which have been decimated by misguided policies and parking restrictions.
Despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary the plans still parrot the woke nonsense about active travel routes with more money to be wasted on unused walking and cycling networks. People need to be able to carry goods, move children and elderly people about and wont use bikes or walk in inclement weather.

Yes

ID sylw: 96273

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne & Wasperton Joint Parish Council

The Barford, Sherbourne & Wasperton Joint Parish Council met and discussed 12 Strategic Objectives, and looked at these objectives across the plan. The following objectives were agreed with no comments, just our support: 2,6,8 and 10. However we felt that we needed to make comment on all the remaining Strategic Objectives.

Yes

ID sylw: 96277

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

I agree with objectives 1 to 12. These have also to be applied where housing has already been built, but the infrastructure has not yet been provided.

Other

ID sylw: 96423

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Julie Springate

The desire to protect our environmental assets is objective No.12.
This means that once you have achieved all the other objectives you will then realise you have destroyed so much countryside we will have lost our environmental assets. The vast areas assigned for housing is very destructive, and will significantly reduce the quality of life in Warwickshire.

Yes

ID sylw: 96460

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Ledger

The strategic objectives are sound. However the plans fun forward to support these do not meet the objectives.

No

ID sylw: 96464

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Stewart

There should have been a letter drop to advise residents about the SWLP and how to respond.
When responding the system should flag those you have already responded to.

Yes

ID sylw: 96572

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Agree with the stated Strategic Objectives 1 to 12.

Yes

ID sylw: 96592

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr

Strategic Objectives #3 and #10 (re Improving the health, safety and quality of life of our communities (and) lower levels of pollution) should mean the Barford Quarry proposal should not be approved. If approved, the quarry would in due course also dramatically increase the risk of flooding - contravening the intent to reduce and manage risk of flooding from all sources

No

ID sylw: 96604

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Griffin

The evidence of current houses built in the approach to Leamington actually detract from the tourism experience. Their designs and layout do nothing to enhance the quality of the community. The developers have proven that this over development actually does nothing to enhance the quality of life. As a resident of Leamington for 63 years, Leamington , Warwick and surrounding areas are the worst they have ever been for quality of life. These proposals will actually make qaulity of life worse for the environment. There is no evidence to support that this is a sustainable solution.

Other

ID sylw: 96609

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Gee

Yes I support these, but question whether an additional 50,000 homes, together with the required infrastructure, will be able to be provided in a sustainable manner. It will also have a detrimental effect on our countryside and valuable Arden landscape. Are you prioritising the conservation of the Arden landscape? This plan should do so.

No

ID sylw: 96633

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs G Wood

Too vague on infrastructure support, stating agreement could be acquiesce to anything.
Warwick, a small town centre with listed buildings, narrow roads, a small hospital (waiting times and parking already an issue) secondary school places already insufficient, major trunk roads are hotspots for closures due to accidents and works, leading to standstills in the town of Warwick, knocking on to Hampton on the Hill & Hampton Magna gridlock. Current ongoing housing expansion evident in various directions around Warwick and Leamington. So feasibility of providing infrastructure essentials as a prerequisite to house building, should be a key objective at the outset.

Yes

ID sylw: 96739

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) broadly supports the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives in this Chapter.
APG would request that in Strategic Objective 3 provision for cemeteries is included.
The word “Schools” should include infrastructure for all age groups including higher and further education.

No

ID sylw: 96828

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julia Jewell

Extensive housing is already taking place and the infrastructure we have in Kenilworth/Leek Wootton can barely cope at the moment. Houses being built are not selling so we don't require further building. It is possible to meet housing needs without building on green belt land. The green belt land is important for people's mental health. We need to keep the identity of villages and towns not merge them together and lose village character

Other

ID sylw: 96916

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Whereat

Proposals will have significant impact on infrastructure of existing rural areas particularly in terms of impact on schools; GP surgeries and the already poor transport and limited access to exiting utilities; footpaths and public transport etc.
How these will be addressed needs to be made clear in future iterations of the Plan

Other

ID sylw: 96949

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

The strategic objectives and overarching principles sound good but it will be very expensive and difficult to achieve them. It is difficult to understand how these principles will apply to the existing communities of Wilmcote and Bearley if 6700 houses are thrust between them.

Yes

ID sylw: 97024

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Victoria Alcock

I am pleased to see a vision that includes bio diversity, also pleased to see that old buildings will be utilised

Other

ID sylw: 97046

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Lewin

If properties were to be built, many of the objectives are acceptable but their impact upon wildlife and open spaces will be extensive. It is difficult to accept that that will not adversely affect the mental and emotional well-being of people living in that area and in the neighbouring areas.

Other

ID sylw: 97053

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mick Smith

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Whilst we are not directly opposed to the proposed strategic growth locations or new settlements put forward, it is considered that a mixture of options is to be required to meet the needs of South Warwickshire’s communities. Whichever Spatial Growth Strategy Option is taken forward, the needs of rural communities must be met via dedicated allocations to villages in the SWLP. This will enable positive planning in response to the requirements of Paragraph 83 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, December 2024) (NPPF83). Small sites will have much faster completion rates than the proposed SGLs and New Settlement allocations.

No

ID sylw: 97146

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vince Holley

N/A

No

ID sylw: 97147

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs June Holley

NA

No

ID sylw: 97193

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Marrons

The Vision should recognise that there are unmet development needs outside of South Warwickshire that may need to be met within South Warwickshire. A Strategic Objective should also be to meet any unmet housing needs from communities elsewhere that cannot meet their needs, where it is practical and consistent with achieving sustainable development. This would align the strategic objective with the ‘positively prepared’ test of soundness.

No

ID sylw: 97285

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Carl Holloway

Many of these objectives and the principles from which they are derived are highly contradictory. You claim to wish to enhance environmental and heritage assets, while pursuing development of tens of thousands of homes on many sites that are largely undeveloped, rural, agricultural land in beautiful, open countryside. Augmenting existing medium to large settlements is more aligned with your principles.

Other

ID sylw: 97353

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Godwin Developments

Godwin Developments are generally supportive of the Strategic Objectives in particular providing sustainable levels of growth in the area, delivering homes that meet the needs of all communities, providing infrastructure in the right place at the right time and creating attractive places.

No

ID sylw: 97438

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

we support principle of new settlements but these must be complemented by smaller allocations that are more deliverable in the short term unless the objectives of the plan may not be met.

Yes

ID sylw: 97451

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

I agree with the iodea of 20 minute communities wher there is about a maximum ofa 20 minute for most people to local amenities

Yes

ID sylw: 97524

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Henderson

I object

Other

ID sylw: 97547

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Winter

The five overarching principle are more helpful than the strategic objectives. The strategic objectives are too broad and are likely to conflict with one another in practice.

No

ID sylw: 97670

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

The Vision should recognise that there are unmet development needs outside of South Warwickshire that may need to be met within South Warwickshire. A Strategic Objective should also be to meet any unmet housing needs from communities elsewhere that cannot meet their needs, where it is practical and consistent with achieving sustainable development. This would align the strategic objective with the ‘positively prepared’ test of soundness.

Other

ID sylw: 97809

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

The overarching principles and strategic objectives are laudable in theory but it is clear that they are unlikely to be achieved in practice with challenging, costly and in some cases insurmountable obstacles. Taking the second and third overarching principles "a well designed and beautiful South Warwickshire" and " a healthy, safe and inclusive South Warwickshire" you talk about respecting the existing beauty and heritage of the area and enabling everyone to enjoy a good quality of life. However, it is obvious that in the case of BW this would not apply to the adjacent communities of Wilmcote and Bearley.

No

ID sylw: 98000

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Liz Harrison-Hall

Swamping our local infrastructure (water supply, utilities, roads, GP and hospital services, schools etc)
Damaging biodiversity: wildlife habitats will be destroyed.
Destruction of good agricultural land which currently provides food
Thousands more vehicles flooding our roads and causing severe congestion
Loss of protected woodland and trees