Yes

ID sylw: 98942

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

I broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives.

Yes

ID sylw: 98981

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mac Mic Group

Asiant : McLoughlin Planning

We support the identified Strategic Objectives at Section 3.2 of the PO Consultation. In particular, we support the identification of the delivery of homes to meet community needs at Strategic Objective 2. It is abundantly clear that housing delivery is of upmost importance to the Government, with the Deputy Prime Minister pointing to our being “in the middle of the most acute housing crisis in living memory”.

Other

ID sylw: 99000

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs JILL CHAMBERS

More careful consideration of flood impacts where new settlements are built and existing/old water routes are affected. Additionally the impacts of HS2 on roads and the damage HS2 caused to the local environments, trees, hedges, verges and road surfaces

No

ID sylw: 99019

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: J & E Evans Properties Limited

Asiant : Marrons

The Vision should recognise that there are unmet development needs outside of South Warwickshire that may need to be met within South Warwickshire. A Strategic Objective should also be to meet any unmet housing needs from communities elsewhere that cannot meet their needs, where it is practical and consistent with achieving sustainable development. This would align the strategic objective with the ‘positively prepared’ test of soundness.

Yes

ID sylw: 99104

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

The strategic objectives are all very fine but my comment the is the plan does not always apply them. For instance:
1. Shipston is not an a sustainable transport corridor and is severely lacking in other infrastructure but the plan still puts forward land enough around the town to double its size.
2. Long Marston is put forward as a new settlement of up to 10000 houses but there is no plan to reinstate the most sustainable form of transport, the rail line from Stratford to Honeybourne.

Yes

ID sylw: 99145

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fernando Ortelli

Rail and bus networks need significant improvement if net zero is to be achieved

Other

ID sylw: 99161

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The vision, principles and strategic objectives require a rethink and it is noted that the vision previously received a low level of support. South Warwickshire is characterised by urban areas and numerous rural settlements and the policies should better reflect that particular character - the principles could apply anywhere and imply there is nothing distinctly ‘South Warwickshire’ about them. A major omission is that the vision does not seem to give sufficient emphasis to economic growth. The over-arching principle should be concerned with supporting infrastructure ‘in the round’ and there should not be undue emphasis on transport as currently stands.

No

ID sylw: 99172

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Val Sassall

The number of development sites proposed to significantly increase the size of South Warwickshire villages will ruin these village communities. People live here because of the current communities and enjoyable natural environment surrounding them.
This plan is very difficult to comment on with so many different individual sites requiring comment.
It is impossible to assess without detailed infrastructure plan to support it. Energy, water, roads, doctors, dentists, hospital and transportation is full already.

Other

ID sylw: 99221

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Garry Rollason

Whilst I agree with the general thrust of the strategic objectives much of the detailed content of the document is not consistent with the objectives. For example how can making provision for 50,000+ houses in a rural area like South Warwickshire be consistent with protecting and enhancing our environmental assets OR improving the quality of life of our communities. There are many other examples I could give.

No

ID sylw: 99237

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

We object to the plan period and nature of the two-part plan.

No

ID sylw: 99243

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

We are concerned objectives may not be realised.

Yes

ID sylw: 99334

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford District Council Green Group

In order of importance:
1st - SO 6
2nd - SO 1,2,3,5,10,12
3rd - SO 4,7,11
4th - SO 8 and 9

No

ID sylw: 99396

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

Not if this means more growth, when HS2 and already new developments built or in progress are already having a major negative impact on historical heritage, countryside, village boundaries and wildlife habitat.

No

ID sylw: 99438

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carolyn Haynes

The vision is not realistic. The schools are largely oversubscribed, as are the health centres. There is no 24 hour local hospital. The roads that lead to the proposed new settlements are single lane. The main townships of Stratford, Alcester and Bidford cannot support additional traffic into the town centres and are filled with historic buildings so widening is not an option.

Yes

ID sylw: 99449

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

These seem to be very reasonable objectives and I agree with them all.

No

ID sylw: 99457

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Cooper

These proposals are nothing more than PR speak and will not transform Warwickshire into a great place to live, work, and relax. Traffic queues are already the norm, yet no new roads are planned and the curse of drivers racing through local villages to avoid traffic is happening now. Net Zero Carbon targets, fine words but there is nothing here to support that. Planners allowing the majority of supermarkets to be located south of Leamington doesn't inspire confidence, nor does the costly provision of barely used cycle lanes.

No

ID sylw: 99459

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Afolabi Okeshola

I disagree with Strategic Objective 7 especially. The focus should be on maintaing rather than creating attractive places. Areas like South Warwickshire are essentially what makes England English and should be maintained as such.

Yes

ID sylw: 99479

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

NA

No

ID sylw: 99498

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nicholas Sears

Warwickshire is already too built up

Yes

ID sylw: 99513

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Karen Abbotts

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 99623

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Bedford

.

No

ID sylw: 99631

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Brooker

I strongly disagree to the council needing to provide "active travel" or "Sustainable modes of travel" as the Government already have legislation in place for net zero, so there is no need to spend further money that restricts car use on the ground of sustainability as they will be electric in future and cars are needed in all the rural distinct.

Yes

ID sylw: 99684

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 99716

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Cooper

A well-designed and beautiful South Warwickshire cannot be achieved if rural land is covered by housing and solar farms. Eyesores are not beautiful. While I support the re-use and refurbishment of unused existing buildings, there are buildings occupied for only part of the year by students. This should be discouraged, the accommodation should be for local people thereby easing demand for new housing. Universities and Colleges should provide on-site accommodation, a Net Zero Carbon benefit, removing the need for daily student transport from outlying areas. No doubt the current housing occupied by students would be improved by landlords.

No

ID sylw: 99989

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Helen Allman

It seems that the discussed proposals have been completely ignored with the housing plans. More houses will completely ignore environmental factors such as protecting wildlife, being carbon zero and connecting people. People and wildlife will be isolated, culture destroyed and tourism damaged. This is why space within cities needs to be better utilised first to answer the housing problem

Other

ID sylw: 99998

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Susan Harrison

Some of the points, e.g. funding for healthcare facilities & schools are outside the control and remit of SWPL and depends on outside agencies e.g. ICS and DoE

Yes

ID sylw: 100196

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr peter spreadbury

I broadly support the Strategic Objectives. We need a great transport infrastructure connected with low cost housing, employment opportunities and our countryside protected for nature and residents.

Yes

ID sylw: 100218

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Partridge

While I support many of the objectives there is a direct contradiction between the vision statement "To make Warwick District a great place to live, work and visit by improving lives and our environment" and the reality. Building in any of the strategic growth areas and particularly any of the new settlement areas would have a hugely detrimental impact on the environment - with the increased levels of traffic congestion, noise, pollution, destruction of green spaces all having a negative effect on quality of life in this area. Development on this scale would benefit neither existing nor new residents.

No

ID sylw: 100223

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr colin roberts

The objectives and visions may sound laudable but they still lack clarity and are contradictory in their aims. How the objectives are going to be met 'efficiently' and 'sustainably' is not clearly defined, measurable or credible eg increasing housing but retaining beauty; increasing transport and job opportunities (more lorry distribution parks?) whilst meeting net zero carbon targets; preventing crime but cutting police forces etc. Residents need to know in more detail the reality of how these visions will be practically achieved over the planned time period given the likelihood of political changes.

No

ID sylw: 100521

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Draper

The strategy does not recognise the negative impact the community will endure during the construction of C1 settlement.
There is no mention of impact to the character of the area surrounding the C1 site. The strategy uses terms that are based on national development objectives ( ie 20 minute neighbourhood ) which are not possible for the C1 settlement. Sprawling across the countryside into an area with limited infrastructure and a current car use necessity which will not change just because of C1.