No

ID sylw: 87150

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

I am extremely concerned the impact of a possible development of over 6000 homes at BW's impacting the village I live in, Snitterfield. I can see that increasing Bearley by this much will result in Snitterfield becoming a rat run through to the A46 & M40 which would significantly degrade our quality of life in the village. I am also concerned the impact such a large development will have on the Snitterfield Bushes which are already delicate and the local road infrastructure which already cannot cope with the weekly influx of visitors every weekend and bank holiday into Stratford.

No

ID sylw: 87156

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jan Wood

The Plan for proposed Solar Farms takes in some land that we own, we have never been consulted about this. The proposed area comes right upto our listed house and listed barn, how can this happen and how can it be put forward to the public domain without us being consulted?

No

ID sylw: 87162

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs LUCY FIRTH

Green belt should not be developed on. The proposed development sites in Kingswood would not be suitable for many reasons;
Heritage site
Conservation area
Roads are not suitable for an increase in traffic or construction vehicles due to a low bride which cannot be altered
Doctors is at full capacity
Not enough schools in the area
Not enough room for cycle paths or widening of the paths
It will increase the light pollution
Noise pollution
Ruin agricultural farming land

No

ID sylw: 87181

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Charlotte Franklin

Green areas should be protected. Traffic in Leamington area is already very high. Huge amount of new housing already built and overwhelming such a lovely area that needs to be protected.

No

ID sylw: 87190

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Mckiernan

Disappointing to see that the area around Hatton Park and Hatton proper are being ranked so highly as suitable for development, seemingly because of the single ownership (Arkwright family) of most of the site and apparent ease of getting the development delivered.

This site is entirely innapropriate for such ahuge development and while I'm not against development of the area at the righ density, this is far from it. The infrastructure not cope currently with recent large developments in Hatton Park and Hampton Magna (with more already imminent in the latter), let alone this.

Other

ID sylw: 87191

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Howarth

Would like to know where the Information Centre is in Shipston on Stour and was disappointed in the Consultation afternoon held in the confines of the Shipston Leisure Centre

Yes

ID sylw: 87220

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Babs Gisborne-Land

OK

No

ID sylw: 87262

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Chloe Grantham

With living in Studley all my life I can’t imagine there being a development of 1000 houses. This would ruin the environment and create more of a problem for traffic. There’s not enough services to accommodate for this. The doctors, dentist & schools would suffer. With the area being on green belt surely this should be opposed against? The area would become more polluted. This would double Studley and the view would be ruined. Houses all built on top of each other not considering the nature.

No

ID sylw: 87275

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Rebecca Tee

Local roads around do not support level of housing. Local estates already have drivers speeding and yet there are 5 schools in the communities close to proposed plans.
Countryside already decimated by HS2.
Disgraceful using green belt.

No

ID sylw: 87286

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Broughton

Inadequate infrastructure to support the plan in particular Road, rail, schooling, medical - hospital and GP surgeries

No

ID sylw: 87316

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Rebecca Mitchell

Your preferred option shows buildings very close to Warwick racecourse, right next to Gogg Brook. This brook already has a huge burden of Warwick racecourse excess water being piped into Gogg Brook. The attached football club is also draining water into the Brook. Areas around Chase Meadow and Forbes Estate are under increasing flood risk. The extra run off would be untenable.

No

ID sylw: 87334

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stuart Grant

1) Loss of green belt and agricultural land
2) No extra capacity in the local schools.
3) Roads in the area are already overcrowded with commuters and parents dropping off and picking up from the local schools in the morning and afternoons.
4) Doctor's surgeries are having to take extreme measures to handle the current level of patients. Is there a plan for more surgeries?
5) Increase in pollution in and around local school sites due to overcrowded roads and standing traffic.

No

ID sylw: 87338

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs K Shaw

Road infrastructure is insufficient and retaining productive arable land should be a priority

Other

ID sylw: 87376

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nicholas Guntrip-Hook

The importance of prioritising future generational needs as less of us drive, and take public services, to jobs. Avoiding the coalescence of parishes. Encouraging optimal positioning for homes to healthcare, shops and the village hub. Considering the importance of infrastructure first and the priority of public needs over private profit

No

ID sylw: 87462

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elizabeth Taylor

The area is already been over developed over the last 5 years especially. The roads cannot cope with the volume of traffic through Barford, Warwick and Leamington now. To build another 6,000 houses in X1 area would bring the roads to a standstill. The infrastructure is already overwhelmed, how can it possibly support this kind of development. It is already difficult to get doctors or hospital appointments. The schools are also difficult to get into.

No

ID sylw: 87622

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rachel James

We absolutely DO NOT support the proposal. Insufficient infrastructure, no capacity in schools and health facilities, spoiling the countryside and current farming use. It’s disrespectful to the people that live here to think new build estates are appropriate. People live here because they do NOT want to live in a built up area and they have homes sympathetic with the landscape. This is no place for the obligatory social housing that comes with new estates. New developments bring people that do not respect the land, have nothing to do and a spike in crime is inevitable.

No

ID sylw: 87647

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Lax

SG06 green belt shouldn't be built on, as it's a valued space for walking, exercise, and wellbeing. Housing targets can be met elsewhere without sacrificing this protected land. SG06 lacks the infrastructure for thousands of new homes, which would worsen traffic and strain schools, GPs, dentists and other essential services. It also supports biodiversity, high-quality farmland, and prevents urban sprawl. The Local Plan prioritises sustainability, yet building here would undermine those principles. Once lost, Green Belt land cannot be recovered, and approving development would set a harmful precedent. Preserving SG06 is essential for Leamington’s environment, character, and community.

Yes

ID sylw: 87678

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr justin kerridge

broadly support

No

ID sylw: 87759

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Melinda Wood

I disagree with the proposal to build 8000 houses at Hatton on Green Belt land. Green belt is green belt for a reason. It protects our wildlife and if violated will result in a sprawling continuum of housing similar to the states. It is important to maintain green belt in its legal status to support the environment and sustainability. The Warwickshire wildlife trust is actively trying to purchase land to create corridors that link habitats. Not only this, the land identified in section B1 is currently being farmed and this should be safeguarded

No

ID sylw: 87768

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Ellison

SG06 is entirely unsuitable for development. It contradicts the Local Plan’s sustainability goals, relies on flawed assessments, and ignores policies protecting the Green Belt, farmland, and biodiversity. Removing this land would set a dangerous precedent for urban sprawl, permanently damaging North Leamington’s character and environment. I urge the Council to remove SG06 from consideration and prioritize sustainable, non-Green Belt locations that align with planning principles and community needs. Approving this development would cause irreversible harm to our environment, infrastructure, and quality of life.

No

ID sylw: 87778

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Holly Hoque

This land provides a much needed respite from the town and a habitat for wildlife.
Many people of all ages enjoy the footpaths across this land for wellbeing
I strongly oppose the proposal

No

ID sylw: 87846

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Catherine Vincett

Due to the danger of Offchurch Road and the flooding issues we already incur I am not in support of the proposal to build new homes between Cubbington and Lillington. I am in fear everyday walking my children from my house around the corner of Offchurch Road opposite Thwaites because of the blind bend, the speed at which cars travel around it and the narrowness of the road, particularly with the significant increase of enormous lorries and construction vehicles which regularly have to mount the curb to pass each other. IT IS NOT SAFE.

No

ID sylw: 87925

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mr mark betker

I think the whole process is designed to alienate and discourage residents to contribute to the future planning process, thus easing the way for undemocratic decisions relating to planning being decided against the wishes of the communities and majority of people, by a minority who have made the whole process over complex and dependent upon being tech savvy.

Other

ID sylw: 88098

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Willson

Trying to find information about developments in and around Barford.

Yes

ID sylw: 88209

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Julie Hudson

Overall it is helpful to have several ways to respond and to be able to select relevant sections.

The consultation contains a huge amount of material and requires a very high level of literacy. Will respondents fairly represent local demographics, or mostly (unfairly) the engaged intelligentsia?

On the call for land for large scale clean energy, I think more transparency is needed. How will balance between community and commercial schemes be achieved, given scope for opportunism? The economics of commercial green energy owned by eg powerful national developers are less likely to be fairly shared.

Other

ID sylw: 88210

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Less sites is required for Travellers. SWLP / District Councils should push back on Government regarding a clear strategy to house Travellers in "New Strategic Sites in the UK" but not many dispersed site. Create their own community and not have sites within every district. Everyone residing their must be legally allowed to reside in UK.

No

ID sylw: 88211

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Woods

As a resident of Shrewley Common, I would like to state my very strong objections to the proposals to develop the area of Hatton with 8000+ dwellings etc. The impact of such a huge development will be catastrophic for the local environment, and detrimental to the living conditions of all in the area . Apart from the loss and protection of Green Belt land , this development will overburden and cause the collapse of an already strained Infrastructure on Roads , Sewerage , Health , Education etc .

No

ID sylw: 88272

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kathleen Chambers

Impact on traffic and highways, not able to cope with the additional traffic.
There is at the moment insufficient GP surgeries to cope with the present residents also schools and other community assets.
Also public services, water, electric etc are already over stretched.
Inappropriate development of the green belt is my main concern.

No

ID sylw: 88282

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Timlin

The proposed building developments on Greenbelt land in North Leamington is not needed. Aside from building on protected treasured greenbelt land, there is plenty of house building in south leamington to provide the need for housing in our area.The infrastructure is already creaking in the south of the town. There is no sustainable infrastructure or space for it in the north of the town. The main trunk roads and roads off them are swamped with traffic, the vehicle pollutants are suffocating the people and nature.The hard standing of buildings is impacting on natural rainfall run off and creating flooding.

No

ID sylw: 88286

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Jo Robinson

D