Yes

ID sylw: 90144

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanna Garstang

yes

Other

ID sylw: 90163

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Fox

Having this online form and format is not inclusive to get feedback from the full population.
It should be clearer that other forms of communication are welcomed and should be more readily available.

No

ID sylw: 90225

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Fox

Any development in Henley should start with identifying the local needs. The proposal appears excessive and will require major infrastructure changes; eg roads, sewage, medical & schools. There will be serious risk of damage to the ancient High Street.

No

ID sylw: 90372

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

These are signficantly important and complex documents included in consultaiton, some of which are contradictory. Charging for hard copies is very unfair, and fails to accommodate the needs of residents. The timescales suggested for consultation are too short to permit meaingful consultation given both the signfiance of proposals and the complex accompanying documentation.
My confidence is a meangingful consultation process has been further damaged by reference to areas which are at flood risk not being included. Shipston on Stour (SG17) is considered to be one of the highest risk areas of South Warwickshire. It can and does flood regularly.

No

ID sylw: 90378

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart

You do not make it clear or easy about exactly what the proposals are that are being considered - in this specific section.

Other

ID sylw: 90482

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley

The process is very complex and I really worry whether many potential consultees have the time to fully understand how to have their say.

Yes

ID sylw: 90484

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley

Yes, there are sufficient ways for consultees to have their say, if they have the time to plough through all the documents.

Yes

ID sylw: 90571

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick Town Council

N/a

No

ID sylw: 90689

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Butterworth

It is difficult to absorb the details of such a wordy plan which is made all the worse by the difficulty in responding to said proposals. For those residing in Hockley Heath, on the WM side, where the most impact will be felt, the consultation has been dreadful; moreover when invited to attend our meetings, not one officer or elected member from Stratford UDC accepted the invitation to attend!
There are issues on environmental/ecology, infrastructure and service capacity facing HH which, I hope this docuement enables me to respond to.

No

ID sylw: 90721

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Maxine Mayer

The consultation is poor. It only provides limited info. Residents really do need to know what is being proposed in neighbouring council areas, particularly those adjacent to our boundaries or share infrastructure. Also potential solar farms should have been included.

Other

ID sylw: 90769

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Hamnett

I have previously asked that an option protecting the Green Belt should be prepared for evaluation. This has not been shown. This is a crucial concern that has been frequently ignored in your selected option. Not only is it essential to keep our settlements apart but is fundamental to achieve the protection of the design and setting of our important heritage environment. For example: the slopes and views of the River Avon valley; and the northern entrance to Leamington Spa from Kenilworth. These areas for leisure use and are mostly in necessary agricultural use.

There are other sites for development.

No

ID sylw: 90776

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Sherriff

too many houses for the infrastructure this side of the Tramway bridge - all services must be in place before houses - The B 4632 road is inadequate for traffic load , bypass A road must be installed before any more built on the airfield (524 units) - its unsafe today for a B road - Its impossible to register for the Doctors surgery or the Dentist at Quinton
There are insufficient jobs in this area South of Stratford so its a vicious circle - Roads first !!

No

ID sylw: 90780

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Jeffreys

SG18 West of Stratford upon Avon, in particular the section of land in-between Luddington Road and Evesham Road is in particular out of keeping with the rest of the rest of the SG18 location encroaching onto entrance to the racecourse, river and greenway area.

No

ID sylw: 90800

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Hartley

The scope of the consultation is far too broad, complex and time-consuming to achieve meaningful engagement with the public and thereby provide a reliable inputs to decision-making

No

ID sylw: 90809

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gerard Hallahan

Strenuously object to suggestion of development of SG20 site.
Planning Application 10/01787/FUL and Council reasons for granting it details amongst others the historical and archaeological significance of Famington Old Farm and the strenuous conditions attached to its development/conservation represented the Councils own views.
Site SG20 envelops this site which is considered of ‘local historical significance.
Additionally,
- Arden’s Grafton /Temple Grafton are non service villages .
- no Bus or rail services with access along such as Grafton Lane wholly unsuitable for development , on grounds of cost and safety.
-no infrastructure other than electricity and water ( septic tanks).

No

ID sylw: 90832

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Wharton

We want to raise the following concerns with particular reference to SG24.
Schools already oversubscribed and even locals cannot get into the schools now.
Doctors oversubscribed, cannot get appointments
Park View will not be able to take additional traffic. Road currently in poor condition due to current local traffic
Congestion caused at junction of Park View and Aylesbury Road and at Junction of Aylesbury Road and Stratford road

No

ID sylw: 90834

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Schofield

The format used for providing feedback is laborious and likely to deter the public from giving feedback. I think this could have been done in a much simpler, user friendly way.

Other

ID sylw: 90869

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs sarah wood

I believe that the consultation response methodology (the whole website and all of the documentation) has been overly complicated and has made it impossible for older generations and those less able to get to grips with what is required in order to respond appropriately.The documentation is formatted in a way that is overly processed and unintelligible in parts assuming that the reader has a grasp of council planning
The use of external agencies in developing the associated documents and analysis is huge and would contribute significant spend.

Other

ID sylw: 90948

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lindsey Davies

Please take the time to read full comments (not just summary)

Pedestrianise adjoining areas for safer travel by foot or cycling
More schools
More nurseries
More supermarkets
Dentists
More GPs
More outdoor areas for leisure
More hospitality / essential shops such as pharmacies with longer opening hours

No

ID sylw: 90971

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Badham

I’ve lived in the area for over 25 years, and I can not support these proposals. Shipston can not possibly support 1600-3000 new homes. The infrastructure will not cope. Schools are already full, there is no train station supporting Shipston, the present doctors surgery is already full. Our local roads are crumbling & flooding in many places is common place. Proposed sites couldn’t possibly be described as ‘grey spaces’ these are green belt places. And vital to the existing local community

Yes

ID sylw: 90974

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Timothy crook

N/a

No

ID sylw: 90982

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Sanders

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 90996

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

No

ID sylw: 91039

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elaine Wilcox

Excessive flooding
more traffic with no roads in place to support
no schools & doctors isn't big enough
sewage,electricity and water supplies unable to cope now
grade 2 farmland (green belt)
buses inadequate
crime with no police

No

ID sylw: 91050

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sylvia Maltby

Green belt farming, the roads are already prone to flooding, and aren't equipped for more more traffic, heritage will be lost, crime will increase as and the water supply, electric, and sewage are not adequate

No

ID sylw: 91141

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janet Johnson

The consultation around this plan is undemocratic. Something of this importance should have been communicated to EVERY household but when I’ve asked both planning departments about this one suggested it would have been too expensive and instead were relying on word of mouth(!) while the other council cited GDPR constraints!
The aim of the consultation seems to be having the poorest possible response - the documentation is too dense and virtually unintelligible unless you have an understanding of planning jargon.

Yes

ID sylw: 91171

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

It is important that communities are consulted and their views not ignored. I have a concern that having collected views from this consultation that will be the end of engagement with the community before decisions are made which will prove that the consultation was no more than a process step. REAL CONSULTATION and GENUINE, SINCERE ENGAGEMENT is not a one time event. It is a continuum.

No

ID sylw: 91206

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Palmer

Your proposals regarding SG24 will destroy the character of the Village of Hockley Heath

No

ID sylw: 91270

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Dodd

SG04
Inappropriate development of green belt land.
Detrimental impact upon residential amenity.
Insufficient infrastructure.
Public services inadequate.

Yes

ID sylw: 91293

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoffrey Olsson

Shipston has contributed more than its share to providing additional housing to satisfy the national need. The area to the east of the Stour is very prone to flooding so should be left natural. The prospect of losing the recycling depot is very undesirable as this is a well used local facility. The areas west of Hanson Avenue are prone to produce a large flow of water when raining so will only get worse if built upon. Local health and education facilities are would be unable to accommodate the extra population. Need to preserve the character of the town centre.