Proposed Modifications January 2016

Support

Representation ID: 69172

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Agent: Savills

SUPPORT the allocation of additional land for housing at Kings Hill and associated amendment to the Urban Area Boundary (Site Ref: H43, Policies Map 36). SUPPORT the removal of land from the Green Belt at Kings Hill.

Object

Representation ID: 69173

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Agent: Savills

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

OBJECT to the following policy wording:
k) "provision of emergency services infrastructure and other issues that may be identified" - this requirement is too general and needs more clarification in terms of scale and associated costs. We would request that "and other issues that may be identified" is removed from the text.
With respect to item g), we would also note that consideration has been given by Lioncourt to the option of a station within the Kings Hill site. An initial feasibility study has been carried out which identifies a number of issues with this location

Object

Representation ID: 69175

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Agent: Savills

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Query how sites within the boundary of the City of Coventry will benefit "from a key set of objectives" (New Para 1.4) a where there are separate plans and policies in force. Greater clarity required on how Warwick DC will facilitate ongoing discussions regarding infrastructure provision with Coventry City Council, outside Memorandum of Understanding.
New Paragraph 1.10 confirms that proposals for Kings Hill will need to accord with the requirements of all other relevant policies in the Local Plan. Have undertaken a review of the Submitted Policies dated February 2015 as part of consultation response.

Support

Representation ID: 69176

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Agent: Savills

SUPPORT the full allocation of Kings Hill site (i.e. 4,000 homes) as this will enable the comprehensive planning for the whole allocation whilst focussing on the deliverability in the plan period of the first 1,800 dwellings.

Support

Representation ID: 69177

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Agent: Savills

SUPPORT the full allocation of Kings Hill site (i.e. 4,000 homes) as this will enable the comprehensive planning for the whole allocation whilst focussing on the deliverability in the plan period of the first 1,800 dwellings.

Object

Representation ID: 69179

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Agent: Savills

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

New Paragraph 1.10 confirms that proposals for Kings Hill will need to accord with the requirements of all other relevant policies in the Local Plan. Have undertaken a review of the Submitted Policies dated February 2015 as part of consultation response.
These comments are provided under separate cover - at the discretion of WDC whether these comments are taken on board. Suggest that where these comments have significant bearing on the Kings Hill allocation and its overall ability to assist in meeting the revised housing target for Warwick, these should be afforded significant weight by the Local Planning Authority.

Support

Representation ID: 70285

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Agent: Savills

SUPPORT the allocation of additional land for housing at Kings Hill and associated amendment to the Urban Area Boundary (Site Ref: H43).
SUPPORT the removal of land from the Green Belt at Kings Hill.