Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for PJPlanning search
New searchObject
Preferred Options
PO1: Preferred Level of Growth
Representation ID: 48234
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: PJPlanning
The preferred level of growth is likely to be inadequate on the grounds that the SHMA has not be carried out in a way that looks across the whole housing market area and thereis no evidence that this difficiency has been addressed throug the Duty to Cooperate.
The preferred options do not provide for economic growth and
balanced housing provision in that option 2 for a higher level of growth (700 house p.a) is dismissed without good grounds.
It is therefore perverse not to provide for option 2 and 600 houses per year should therefore be a minimum
See attachment
Object
Preferred Options
What are the Options?
Representation ID: 48236
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: PJPlanning
The preferred options does not address how it is intended to achieve delivery in the first 5 years to achieve a 5 year supply of land for housing
See attachment
Object
Preferred Options
PO4: Distribution of Sites for Housing
Representation ID: 48239
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: PJPlanning
The Proferred options relies too heavily on windfalls (33%) - this is not consistent with a plan-led system.
There is no justification for the allocation of 500 homes to category 1 villages and it is not therefore clear how the plan will achieve sustainable developent
The proposals for green belt changes in and around village needs to be justified through exceptional circumstances. It seem unlikely that these can be demonstrated as there are sustainable locations outside the green belt which haven't been adequately explored
See attachment
