Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 48234
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: PJPlanning
Representation Summary:
The preferred level of growth is likely to be inadequate on the grounds that the SHMA has not be carried out in a way that looks across the whole housing market area and thereis no evidence that this difficiency has been addressed throug the Duty to Cooperate.
The preferred options do not provide for economic growth and
balanced housing provision in that option 2 for a higher level of growth (700 house p.a) is dismissed without good grounds.
It is therefore perverse not to provide for option 2 and 600 houses per year should therefore be a minimum
Full text:
See attachment