Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council search

New search

Form ID: 79103

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Option B1a: Maintain Areas of Restraint and identify appropriate areas within Warwick District

selected

Option B1b: Remove Areas of Restraint designations

selected

Option B1c: Maintain Areas of Restraint within Stratford-on-Avon District but not introduce them into Warwick District

selected

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79104

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Q-B2: Should the Policy on the Vale of Evesham Control Zone be removed, if neighbouring authorities decide not to carry the designation forward?

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79105

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Option B3a: Introduce Special Landscape Areas across all of South Warwickshire

selected

Option B3b: Maintain Special landscape Areas within Stratford-on-Avon District but don't introduce them within Warwick District

selected

Option B3c: Discard Special Landscape Areas and bolster general landscape policy

selected

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79106

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Option B4a: Maintain the current policy approach, without the use of a buffer

selected

Option B4b: Amend the current policy and include a buffer around the periphery of the Cotswold AONB to ensure that great weight is given to any impacts development within this buffer zone may have on the National Landscape

selected

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79107

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Option B5a: Explore and pursue an integrated Environmental Net Gain Policy

selected

Option B5b: Explore environmental net gain through separate policies

selected

Option B5c: None of these

selected

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79108

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Q-B6: Should the South Warwickshire Local Plan introduce Wildbelt designations?

Yes

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79109

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Q-B7: Do you agree that it is appropriate to highlight links to the Minerals Plan, avoiding the unnecessary duplication of policy within the SWLP?

Yes

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79110

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Q-B8.1: Do you agree that the plan should include a policy avoiding development on the best and most versatile agricultural land, unless it can be demonstrated that the harm to agricultural land is clearly outweighed by the benefit of development?

Yes

Q-B8.2: When considering climate change, biodiversity and economic wellbeing, are there any rural land uses or locations that should be prioritised over others?

No answer given

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79111

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Q-B9: Should the plan include a policy requiring the safeguarding of sites of national importance, sites of local importance, and other non-designated sites known to make a positive contribution to biodiversity or geodiversity; unless the benefits of the proposal clearly outweigh the need to protect the site. Where possible conserve and enhance these sites.

Yes

Q-B10: Please add any comments you wish to make about a biodiverse and environmentally resilient South Warwickshire

B1: B1a – Give consideration to areas of restraint to protect settlements in WDC area – e.g. as suggested to protect Barford from the advance of Warwick and Leamington by having a RED LINE at the level of the M40 or A4100. Also along Barford Bypass to protect land to the west. B6: Yes - 30% may be very ambitious, but if we don’t try… B8.1: YES, protect BMV land.

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79112

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Q-P1.1: Do you agree with the proposed broad content of the Part 1 plan?

Q-P1.2: If no, please indicate why

The plan so far does not take enough note of NDPs, which were developed at great cost and enormous effort on behalf of communities. They should be given considerable weight when looking at developing policy which will impact NDP communities. The idea that they must be re-written, if ignored for the purposes of SWLP is preposterous and an insult to those that worked so hard to produce such documents in response to HMG and LA encouragement.

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.