Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council search

New search New search
Form ID: 79093
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Yes

D2: Answer D2b – Perhaps reconsider the concept of Village Design Statements? D5: Yes, but ALWAYS assess balance of public benefit for every proposal, as per NPPF

Form ID: 79094
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

selected

selected

selected

selected

selected

Form ID: 79095
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Yes

No answer given

Form ID: 79096
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Yes

Form ID: 79097
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

selected

selected

Form ID: 79098
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

selected

selected

Form ID: 79099
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

selected

selected

selected

Form ID: 79100
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

selected

selected

Form ID: 79101
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

selected

selected

Form ID: 79102
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

More Automatic Control of traffic is not the only answer. Leaving people greater flexibility in traffic can lead to safer streets with a better traffic flow. Re: European examples.

T3: Answer T3a Any Low Emission Zones should not introduce the closure of any routes. This is self-defeating since it will result in longer journey times, more fuel burn, more pollution, moving the problem elsewhere and more overall congestion. It has also been shown to damage local businesses, increase ambulance attendance times and cause problems for the Police.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.