Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for L&Q Estates search

New search New search
Form ID: 83390
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

Yes

The Vision We support the vision in principle, which seeks to create a prosperous, stronger and sustainable South Warwickshire. The vision provides a positive framework for the Strategic Objectives and is generally aligned with the three overarching sustainability objectives set out in NPPF Paragraph 8. Strategic Objectives We are supportive of the Strategic Objectives, which will address the key strategic challenges and opportunities that have arisen since the Stratford on Avon Core Strategy was adopted in 2016. We consider that the Site, which has the potential to deliver 128 new homes in Alcester as well as significant open space in a sustainable location, would assist the South Warwickshire Authorities in achieving these objectives.

Form ID: 83391
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

3.1 NPPF Paragraph 32 states: ‘Local plans and spatial development strategies should be informed throughout their preparation by a sustainability appraisal that meets the relevant legal requirements. This should demonstrate how the plan has addressed the relevant economic, social and environmental objectives (including opportunities for net gains). Significant adverse impacts on these objectives should be avoided and, where possible, alternative options which reduce or eliminate such impacts should be pursued. Where significant adverse impacts are unavoidable, suitable mitigation measures should be proposed (or, where this is not possible, compensatory measures should be considered).’ It is noted that in the conclusion for the Sustainability Appraisal it states, at paragraph 7.15.11:‘High level assessment of Spatial Growth Options that are not all distinct from each other, with the exception of Option 5, means that sustainability performance can only be evaluated with several caveats. These include the fact that detailed locational information is not available and the ability to identify effects with precision is challenging. The scores in Table 7.1 are strictly a guide and do not represent a diagnostic analysis. Mitigation has not been factored into the performance of the Growth Options since it is best worked up once more detailed locational information is available.’ [emphasis added] Furthermore, the following technical assessments are currently being undertaken to help inform later stages of the plan: • Transport Assessment • Climate Change Impact Assessment • Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure Assessment • Landscape Character Assessment • Health Impact Assessment • Green Belt Study • Heritage Assessment The Issues and Options SA is, by its own admission, heavily caveated and no mitigation has been considered. We therefore reserve the right to comment further at a later stage, once the Sustainability Assessment has advanced following the outcome of key evidence base documents.

Form ID: 83393
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

selected

selected

Form ID: 83394
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

Yes

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy? Yes, we consider that growth of some of South Warwickshire’s existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy. South Warwickshire has a dispersed settlement pattern (as set out in Policy CS.15 of the adopted Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy) and is home to a significant number of existing settlements of varying sizes. The explanatory text under Issue S4 sets out that there are nine towns (Alcester, Henley-in-Arden, Kenilworth, Royal Leamington Spa, Shipston-onStour, Southam, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwick and Whitnash), at least 82 villages and hundreds of hamlets. Issue S4 sets out that the South Warwickshire Local Plan will seek to maximise the capacity of its existing urban areas in order to meet development needs to 2050. However, in deciding upon the best distribution strategy for new development within South Warwickshire, it is important for the Local Plan to consider the potential for growth around the edges of the existing settlements. Alcester is categorised as a ‘Main Rural Centre’ in Policy CS.15 of the adopted Stratfordon-Avon Core Strategy. The settlement hierarchy is defined below 1. Main Town: Stratford-upon-Avon 2. Main Rural Centres (including Alcester) 3. New Settlements 4. Local Service Villages 5. Large Rural Brownfield Sites 6. All other settlements 7. Local Needs Schemes Therefore, Alcester is identified as one of the most sustainable settlements in the settlement hierarchy and spatial distribution of growth in Stratford-upon-Avon district. Alcester offers a large range of services and facilities, including a selection of independent and high street shops, a Post Office, Public Houses, supermarkets, churches, hotels, GP surgeries, veterinary clinic and a leisure centre. Land South of Allimore Lane, Alcester is located east of the A435 and immediately adjoins the built-up area boundary of Alcester and existing residential development to the north and east. The site is contained by the A435 to the west and would form an enduring definition to the built-up area boundary. The promotion site would be well connected to the built-up area of Alcester and would constitute sustainable development. Indeed, it is considered that the new homes at Land South of Allimore Lane will comply with the 20-minute neighbourhood concept, owing to the close proximity of the site to Alcester’s services and facilities. Given the pressing need for additional housing within the Stratford-on-Avon District, Alcester is clearly a sustainable location to accommodate additional housing growth. The Site has been carefully considered to enable a comprehensive planned development to be achieved to deliver new housing (market and affordable) which is well-located in relation to the town and will enhance its vitality in line with national planning policy. Accordingly, it is considered that the Site should be allocated as a residential site within the South Warwickshire Local Plan.

Form ID: 83396
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Appropriate strategy

Form ID: 83398
Respondent: L&Q Estates

Issue S1: Green & Blue Corridors As shown on the Vision Document (Appendix 2) and Concept Masterplan for Land South of Allimore Lane, Alcester, it is proposed to retain and enhance the route of Spittle Brook through the Site with a green and blue infrastructure corridor. It is proposed to create two large wet grassland areas along the Spittle Brook Local Wildlife Site, accommodating wetland scrapes and wildlife ponds to provide net gains in biodiversity and to provide multiple ecological benefits. SuDS will also form an integral part of the development’s green infrastructure, providing ecological benefits and habitat creation, as well as performing their principal function of controlling and managing the flow of surface water run-off during periods of heavy and persistent rainfall. The proposals will deliver a number of landscape benefits, including new Public Open Space, play facilities, recreational routes and a community orchard. New planting will include parkland and avenue tree planting as well as native tree belts. Therefore, the proposals for Land South of Allimore Lane, Alcester demonstrate that green and blue infrastructure can be incorporated into development in many forms. It would be advantageous for additional evidence from the emerging Sub-Regional Green Infrastructure Strategy to be made available as soon as possible in order to inform the proposals for the Site. Therefore, Option S1a would be preferable, considering the production of a Local Nature Recovery Strategy will come after the SWLP Spatial Growth Strategy has been determined.

Form ID: 83399
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

Nothing chosen

It is acknowledged that there have been issues with estimating and projecting the population in Coventry, meaning population growth in the City has been systematically over-estimated by ONS (dating back to at least 2001) and that the over-estimation works through into population projections that are demonstrably too high and unrealistic. The draft Plan considers that as the overall housing need in Coventry is lower in the HEDNA (compared to the previous 2014-based projections), it follows that the Local Plan will be likely to need to accommodate fewer additional homes from Coventry based on these figures. However, it is important to emphasise that the Planning Practice Guidance is clear in its approach that the ‘standard method for assessing local housing need provides a minimum starting point in determining the number of homes needed in an area’ (Paragraph 010; Reference ID: 2a-010-20190220). The draft South Warwickshire Local Plan should therefore reflect that the proposed ‘Housing Need’ figure is only the starting point and additional housing may be required to facilitate economic growth or the delivery of affordable housing. For example, an appeal decision for up to 800 dwellings at the Former North Warwickshire Golf Club (Appeal Ref.APP/P4605/W/18/3192918 – a decision which was ‘called-in’ by the Secretary of State) highlighted the chronic shortfall in affordable housing which has come forward within Birmingham City since 2011. Paragraph 14.108 of the Inspector’s Report states that only 2,757 new affordable homes were provided in the City over the first 6 years of the Plan period. This represents less than half of the target provision and a net increase in only 151 affordable homes if Right to Buy sales are taken into account. The Inspector goes on to state that given the heavy reliance in the five year housing land supply on City Centre apartment schemes, it is difficult to see how that trend can be reversed in the short to medium term (paragraph 14.109). Whilst it is noted that Birmingham City Council does not form one of South Warwickshire’s Authorities, it highlights recent difficulties with delivering homes on brownfield sites. The high proportion of flatted developments, coupled with the increased likelihood of viability issues, has led to a chronic shortfall in the provision of affordable homes. Should the South Warwickshire Authorities follow a similar approach, it may therefore be necessary to increase the Housing Requirement, in accordance with national guidance, to improve affordability. We note that work is ongoing to confirm how much housing can be provided from various sources, both in terms of existing and future capacity to help meet the need. This includes an understanding what has already been built, has planning permission or is identified for development in existing Plans and the capacity of small ‘windfall’ sites. Overall, we support a trend-based approach in principle. However, it is considered that any shortfall in housing supply should be regarded as a minimum given that it is currently calculated against an untested housing target that may require an upward adjustment to take account of affordability.

Form ID: 83400
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

No answer given

selected

selected

selected

No answer given

Form ID: 83401
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

Yes

No answer given

In accordance with the guidance contained within the Framework, development should be focussed in the most sustainable locations in terms of availability of shops, facilities and services, as well as access by modes of transport other than the private car. In addition, it is considered that development should be distributed over a range of settlements rather than in single settlements in order to ensure their vitality and viability in accordance with the principles of sustainable development set out in the Framework.L&Q Estates consider any housing shortfalls from outside of South Warwickshire should be directed to sustainable locations in accordance with the distribution of development established in Policy CS.15 of the adopted Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy. Alcester is identified as one of the most sustainable settlements in the settlement hierarchy and spatial distribution of growth in Stratford-on-Avon district. It offers a large range of services and facilities, including a selection of independent and high street shops, a Post Office, Public Houses, supermarkets, churches, hotels, GP surgeries, veterinary clinic and a leisure centre. Land South of Allimore Lane, Alcester is located immediately east of the A435 and adjoins the built-up area boundary of Alcester and existing residential development to the north and east. The site is contained by the A435 to the west and would form an enduring definition to the built-up area boundary. The promotion site would be well connected to the built-up area of Alcester, a Main Rural Centre with many local services, and would constitute sustainable development. Indeed, it is considered that the new homes at Land South of Allimore Lane will comply with the 20-minute neighbourhood concept, owing to the close proximity of the site to Alcester’s services and facilities. Given the pressing need for additional housing within the Stratford-on-Avon District, in addition to meeting the housing shortfalls from outside of South Warwickshire, Alcester is clearly a sustainable location to accommodate additional housing growth. The Site at Land South of Allimore Lane, Alcester has been carefully considered to enable a comprehensive planned development to be achieved to deliver new housing (market and affordable) which is well-located in relation to the town and will enhance its vitality in line with national planning policy. Accordingly, it is considered that the Site would be an appropriate location to accommodate a residential development to meet housing shortfalls from outside of South Warwickshire.

Form ID: 83402
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

selected

selected

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.