Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership search

Form ID: 82694

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-B8.1: Do you agree that the plan should include a policy avoiding development on the best and most versatile agricultural land, unless it can be demonstrated that the harm to agricultural land is clearly outweighed by the benefit of development?

Yes

Q-B8.2: When considering climate change, biodiversity and economic wellbeing, are there any rural land uses or locations that should be prioritised over others?

No answer given

Form ID: 82695

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-B9: Should the plan include a policy requiring the safeguarding of sites of national importance, sites of local importance, and other non-designated sites known to make a positive contribution to biodiversity or geodiversity; unless the benefits of the proposal clearly outweigh the need to protect the site. Where possible conserve and enhance these sites.

Yes

Q-B10: Please add any comments you wish to make about a biodiverse and environmentally resilient South Warwickshire

Shouldn’t we bring the 2 policies in line with each other?

Form ID: 82696

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-P1.1: Do you agree with the proposed broad content of the Part 1 plan?

Yes

Q-P1.2: If no, please indicate why

No answer given

Form ID: 82697

Respondent: Stratford Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Q-P2.1: Are there any areas where equality and inclusivity in planning needs further attention?

Yes

Q-P2.2: If yes, please give further details

As noted above, inclusivity and equality, and also accessiblility, should be more broadly and more explicitly covered throughout the plan. This is with the purpose of ensuring that the plans provide opporuntity for all within our distrcits, but also to make our places fit for purpose in the future.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.