Yes

Representation ID: 90432

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

Reasons:
1. Could meet all housing needs including space for infrastructure (such as schools, doctors, dentists etc)
2. Good existing road connections
3. Reduce congestion in Stratford upon Avon
4. Housing here likely to have least impact on environment and preserve greenbelt land
5. New settlements are more preferable
6. Potential rail connection with Honeybourne

Yes

Representation ID: 90449

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Terry Simmonds

Ensure employment areas, facilities and services are given priority so residents don't have to travel to nearby towns. Make it the sort of settlement where people have everything they need on their doorstep

Yes

Representation ID: 90470

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

See attachement
This has already been approved as a Garden Village pre Covid - Need to follow through on infrastructure previously committed

Yes

Representation ID: 90513

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jason Lupton

This location has good connections to existing road infrastructure and nearby employment opportunities.
Congestion would be considered during the early stages of development rather then retro-fitting into existing road networks.
A settlement here with associated facilities would ease the pressure on Stratford-upon-Avon - although consideration to the river crossing points needs further thought.
Development here would prevent urban sprawl in existing towns and protect greenbelt.
Good potential for rail connections to Honeybourne or with a direct connection utilising the nearby Innovation Centre.
This settlement can be driven by strategic opportunities and not available land.

Yes

Representation ID: 90546

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Gavin Simpson

Development of this are would minise conjestion for Stratford Upon Avon, a strategically important part of England heritage which is being choked by commuter traffic and has no expansion capability. The area would minise the further loss of green belt wildlife areas and stop the urban sprawl.

Yes

Representation ID: 90637

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Alice Smith

Long Marston is the perfect brownfield site for inclusion in the SWLP preferred options.

Yes

Representation ID: 90648

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Roderick Pickering

I do NOT agree with the proposed new settlrment location because -

1 Parts of F1 location is pending consideration for planning permission for a Solar farm.
2 Part of F1 is an established solar farm.
3 F1 is owned by several land owners, one of which may not agree to sell the land.
4 F1 access would be via two busy roads (A425 & B4455 Fosse Way) making transport links difficult.
5 Consideration should be given to the potential health risks of "Electro Magnetic Fields" from the existing solar farm and
overhead electricity cables that transverse the land.

No

Representation ID: 90650

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Gregory Whitton

Proposed Settlement E1 is a terrible idea without significant investment in infrastructure in the area to cope with demand beforehand including a long-time proposed by-pass at Stratford.

Yes

Representation ID: 90706

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Averil Stewart

not greenfield today, so wouldbe better than using pristine farmland

Yes

Representation ID: 90715

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Goodwin

New settlements are preferable to adding to oversubscribed existing towns and congested roadways. They are driven by strategic opportunities not arbitrary land availability and do not add to the urban sprawl and pressures in existing infrastructures. Such sites do not impact greenbelt land which should be always preserved. Furthermore, it does not add to the urban sprawl or congestion of Stratford upon Avon. With excellent road connections and the potential for rail connection with the rail innovation centre connecting to the Honeybourne line, job opportunities and quality of life are greatly enhanced.

Yes

Representation ID: 90722

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

I believe this location is already proving its worth as a new settlement and should now be treated as one in all aspects. It has the space not only to provide significantly towards the areas housing needs, but also for the associated infrastructure originally proposed for Middle Quinton. The existing road links provide access to job opportunities in South Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire, and there is opportunity to add a rail link using the existing line to the West Coast Mainline via Honeybourne

No

Representation ID: 90755

Received: 23/01/2025

Respondent: Marston Sicca Parish Council

I object to the development of Long Marston Airfield and surrounding land as a new mixed-use settlement unless essential infrastructure improvements are made, including upgrades to the B4632 Campden Road, a relief road around Stratford, and sustainable travel options. The site is inadequately connected to major transport routes, hindering its sustainability and potential for employment. Although I initially supported a development of 3,500 dwellings, this was contingent on necessary traffic infrastructure being established. As no funding exists for these projects, I oppose further phases of development without these improvements in place.

Yes

Representation ID: 90768

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr N Ledger

This area is already partially developed and the infracture requirements are already in place or planned for.

Yes

Representation ID: 90803

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Maria Sacristan

This area would provide enough space for a development that could include resources as needed

Yes

Representation ID: 90805

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tina Hale

This area may take the congestion pressure off some of Stratford . This site also could meet a lot of the housing needs .this area has already a doctors, shop and a school situated in this area.

Yes

Representation ID: 90821

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Margaret Boyes

As a brown field land this is more suitable for a new settlement, there is better access there already, more room for schools and health centres, there is already a shopping centre and industrial estates .
There is access to nearby motorway and good roads to Banbury and Oxford areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 90825

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Margaret Boyes

This would add to an existing development with some facilities and the space to build more infrastructure.
It would also take some of the traffic from Stratford.
This is brown field land which is preferable for housing development.
There is fortunately an existing railway line which could be updated and run to Honeybourne giving wide access.

No

Representation ID: 90838

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Michael Dodd

Local roads and current transport links are not suitable for further development. Bus services are limited and roads are already difficult to navigate at peak times

No

Representation ID: 90849

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Eleanor Kilgallon

Stupid idea, no infrastructure in this area, not enough school, doctors, resources etc.. in addition to just being one road in and out, causes chaos for driving.

Yes

Representation ID: 90859

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Morris

The region offers promising job opportunities, well-developed road networks, and potential for a new Chiltern line railway station and High Speed 2 (HS2) connections, enhancing accessibility. Strategic development can reduce congestion in Stratford, meet housing needs, and preserve greenbelt land by avoiding urban sprawl and incorporating essential infrastructure. Long Marston Airfield is being developed for housing, leveraging existing facilities sustainably. These efforts highlight the region’s commitment to responsible urban planning, ensuring community growth is managed efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.

Yes

Representation ID: 90861

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Emma Barber

There is potential for a new rail connection here connecting to the Honeybourne line. With the number of houses that can be built in this area, important infrastructure like schools and doctors can be built and integral to this new settlement.

Yes

Representation ID: 90904

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Lawrence Mukumbira

The development could meet all housing requirements without impacting the environment and the green belt. New settlements such as these are a better option as they reduce urban sprawl which affects existing infrastructure such as roads, sewage, drainage and pressures on hospitals and schools.
The development will provide opportunities for new schools, towns, hospitals, surgeries and shopping complex. There is also a potential for new rail connections with the rail innovation center connecting to the Honeybourne line.

Yes

Representation ID: 90908

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Wadzanayi Mudzviti

Would take the congestion pressure off Stratford
This new site could meet all the housing needs with least impact on the environment, preserving green belt land
New settlement avoid urban sprawl which strains existing infrastructure
Potential for rail connection with the rail innovation centre connecting to the Honeybourne line.
Number of houses in this area and space available means infrastructure like schools and doctors can be built integral to the new settlement.
New settlements can be driven by strategic opportunities not to just land availability.

Yes

Representation ID: 90977

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Timothy crook

New settlement development at this site represents the best chance of having the appropriate infrastructure in place to be sustainable especially if combined with a river crossings of the avon to the southwest of the town

Yes

Representation ID: 91036

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Rodney Hicken

This area is particularly well suited to growth and potential access to the transport infrastructure without changing the character of Stratford

Yes

Representation ID: 91063

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree, given its location to significant development in area and proposals to grow and develop further. Decent infrastructure which has potential to increase infrastructure if planned properly

Yes

Representation ID: 91129

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

outside of greenbelt

No

Representation ID: 91274

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Ms ELAINE FREEMAN

LOCATION E1 INCLUDES AREAS AT LONG MARSTON AND MEON VALE AND ARE CURRENTLY UNDERGOING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER THERE ARE RESTRICTIONS FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT UNTIL A TRANSPORT INFASTRUCTURE AROUND STRATFORD UPON AVON ARE CARRIED OUT.

Yes

Representation ID: 91302

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Stuart Taylor

Land E1 presents an ideal opportunity for sustainable growth while alleviating congestion pressure on Stratford. This site can meet housing needs with minimal environmental impact, protecting Green Belt land and avoiding the urban sprawl that strains existing infrastructure. Its potential rail connection to the Honeybourne Line via the Rail Innovation Centre enhances regional connectivity. The scale of development allows for integrated infrastructure, including new schools and medical facilities, ensuring a well-planned, self-sufficient community. Development here prioritizes strategic opportunities over mere land availability, making E1 a forward-thinking choice that supports sustainable expansion while safeguarding Stratford’s historic and environmental integrity.

Yes

Representation ID: 91351

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Godefroy

This development is already in progress with suitable infrastructure