No

Representation ID: 85971

Received: 10/01/2025

Respondent: Graham Ball

With a sustainable land supply, continual new settlements are not sustainable, therefore it should not happen. Moreover, the fertility rate in the UK is less than 2 therefore there is no need for new development in the UK.

Yes

Representation ID: 85989

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sian Corrie

In general. new bespoke settlements allow for infrastructure to be considered at the planning stage. New settlements do not cause damage to existing small settlements.

Yes

Representation ID: 85991

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sian Corrie

I support the concept of new settlements, the allow for infrastructure to be considered at the planning stage and do not damage smaller existing settlements.

No

Representation ID: 86408

Received: 23/01/2025

Respondent: Miss Jasmine Wijesuriya

Area already built up enough and the current developments are not finished. Do not want the area to become a small town or the two sites Meon Vale and Shackleton joining. Traffic already busy getting to Stratford-upon-Avon, this would make it far worse.

Yes

Representation ID: 86575

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

The Long Marston area has been the assumed site of a new town for a long time. It's time to get on with it.

Yes

Representation ID: 86774

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr russell gillott

airfield says it itself!

Yes

Representation ID: 86834

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Larkin

The infrastructure is already largely in place to support this.

No

Representation ID: 86870

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Couchman

You have had 10 years to build transport links to facilitate the Garden Village at Long Marston. This hasn't materialised. We live at Long Marston Airfield amongst 300 new homes already built. We travel regularly, at peak times, to Tanworth-in-Arden and Redditch. Our 35 minute journey to Tanworth-in-Arden takes 55 minutes at peak times. The bus service is very limited. Assuming the money isn't available to improve the transport links, then E1 must not be built out. The 20-minute neighbourhood isn't realistic, and no-one will want to move to new homes at this isolated site with poor transport links.

Yes

Representation ID: 86973

Received: 01/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Paulette Hockley

This area has potential to expand without causing too much impact as had some development already . Having already been developed previously there is less threat to wildlife as it’s already moved away for the time being . There is open space will little or no trees

Yes

Representation ID: 87045

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

Long Marston disused airfield is a prime site for building. With good planning, all the facilities a town needs could be provided within the site, including; schools, GP surgery, dentist, shops, leisure areas, green areas, small to medium businesses. It has good links to Evesham. A new bridge into Stratford should not be needed if all facilities are provided on site.

Yes

Representation ID: 87208

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Morris

It would address a significant percentage of the housing requirement in the SWLP alleviating the need for urban development protecting the historic nature of Warwick, Leamington, Stratford and Kenilworth.
– Delivers opportunity to meet differing housing needs as part of a wider community.
– Likely to offer a broader range of housing including the provision of affordable housing for different life stage groups compared to small and medium scale urban development.
– Deliver opportunity to deliver housing alongside employment opportunities.
– Allows for schooling medical and retail to develop alongside the emerging community.

Yes

Representation ID: 87210

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Morris

It would address a significant percentage of the housing requirement in the SWLP alleviating the need for urban development protecting the historic nature of Warwick, Leamington, Stratford and Kenilworth.
– Delivers opportunity to meet differing housing needs as part of a wider community.
– Likely to offer a broader range of housing including the provision of affordable housing for different life stage groups compared to small and medium scale urban development.
– Deliver opportunity to deliver housing alongside employment opportunities.
– Allows for schooling medical and retail to develop alongside the emerging community.

No

Representation ID: 87319

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Patricia Scott

Before extending Meon Vale, the LPA needs to consult with the people who are now living there about the failures of the developers to deliver environmental benefits/mitigation.

Yes

Representation ID: 87449

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Stuart Keighley

Supportive but conditional on adequate infrastructure for residents. This settlement will have a significant impact on the congestion in and around Stratford at peak times.

Yes

Representation ID: 87540

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

Suitable

Yes

Representation ID: 87629

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Cassidy

This area is more suitable as it is not prime agricultural land and is previously developed land due to the use as an airfield. It is close to a good transport network. It is close to Stratford for employment opportunities and facilities.

Yes

Representation ID: 87636

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Cassidy

This area is more suitable as it is not prime agricultural land and is previously developed land due to the use as an airfield. It is close to a good transport network. It is close to Stratford for employment opportunities and facilities.

Yes

Representation ID: 88030

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as this is an existing area that has been recently developed for housing and so will effectively be an extension of that.

Yes

Representation ID: 88033

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Due to the size of development built so far it would make sense to add to the current development to create a new town and include all the infrastructure that was due to be built including schools, surgeries, etc.

Yes

Representation ID: 88059

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

A standalone non-greenfield site.

Yes

Representation ID: 88119

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

Proposed new settlement benefits from areas of brownfield, lacks rail connective and road capacity connections to Stratford, however support in principle.

Yes

Representation ID: 88266

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Helena Flisowski

This site would have reasonable access to employment west of Stratford upon avon

Yes

Representation ID: 88345

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

The greenway would seem to be an ideal, almost ready made active travel corridor, that just needs an all weather surface and lighting to improve it. Couple that with an e-bike/e-cargo bike hire/shared use scheme and you could potentially keep a lot of car journeys out of Stratford. Especially if the new settlement can supple day-to-day retail needs for food and cafe/working space. It also ties in with the existing Meon Vale development in that area. I would fund the active & public transport in preference to the SWRR that will induce more car usage.

No

Representation ID: 88379

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Tom Stone

The B4632 Campden Road is already at capacity, it cannot sustain further traffic from more development, especially to the size of potential site considered here. Why is the proposed development covering such a large area? There has already been significant development at Long Marston airfield, why not limit the size of development to the original long marston airfield and look for other areas. This would limit the impact on road network that is already struggling in this part of South Warwickshire.

Yes

Representation ID: 88546

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Yes, again provided adequate infrastructue is provided to coincide with the occupation of the initial part of the development, including adequate transport facilities.

No

Representation ID: 88583

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Greatorex

I do not agree with long marston airfield, it will substantially increase traffic through Mickleton , it will also increase traffic through Ilmington and Armscote because of using it as a cut through to avoid main roads, whilst these are classed as B roads route Armscote is very narrow, it isn’t suitable for HGVs yet they come through that will only increase , have noticed significant increase in traffic through armscote since new developments on Meon vale area already over past few years including all delivery drivers Amazon DPD also not sufficient infrastructure in terms of schools GP surgery hospital

Yes

Representation ID: 88606

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Given the significant investment already in this area, this is a sensible and logical location

Yes

Representation ID: 88708

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

Good transport links and possible use of the greenway in line with Warwickshire County Council's LCWIP. The area already has a reasonable level of infrastructure including shops, community centre and medical facilities at Meon Vale and Quinton within short distance.

Yes

Representation ID: 88809

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Abbie Daw

More suited to more houses compared to a village

No

Representation ID: 88879

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Naomi Wilson

This land is already undergoing significant development, which the local area is already struggling to integrate. It is a nonsense that inhabitants will not travel for work. Large employers are on the other side of Stratford, in Warwick, and Birmingham. This all relies on the road into Stratford. Further development of this area to the scale noted in the Consultation will have an enormous impact on the surrounding area. The scale of this is completely unsuitable.