No

Representation ID: 93290

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs MEGHNA BELSHAW

Given that the proposed development would be harmful.to.the nature but also disruptive one shouldn't consider this as a viable.option

Yes

Representation ID: 93295

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Duncan Taylor

This meets the criteria:
PD1 Spatial Growth Priority Area
PD14 Major Investment Site
Major employment site (spatial growth strategy)
It is already part of SDC Core Strategy Development Proposals

And it is not part of the green belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 93299

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Council

Most suitable site for a new settlement in whole plan if transport links can be sorted.

Yes

Representation ID: 93375

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Daryl Kerin

Not within the Green Belt. Extending existing new development approval.

Yes

Representation ID: 93384

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ian Michael Hayes

Long Marston already accommodated significant visitor numbers on a regular basis to their market.
The area is an appropriate distance from existing towns and cities to be able to adopt a new 'personality' of its own as a settlement.

Yes

Representation ID: 93399

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ewa Kerin

As it is not Green Belt and this would be extension of the existing approved development.

Yes

Representation ID: 93429

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Teresa Hayes

This is a brownfield site. It is ideally positioned for a new hospital and new infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 93500

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Gunnell

A new settlement provides the opportunity to develop a planned infrastructure before houses are built i.e. roads, services and a community village approach a focal point rather than just an additional housing estate .The E1 proposal would provide homes south of Stratford in a new developing area with a planned road system

Yes

Representation ID: 93548

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jon Redhead

A good site for access to local employment & transport links, with proven capacity for management of traffic, given that a weekly market and events which were hosted there, have been successfully accommodated.

Yes

Representation ID: 93656

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire STEWART

New settlements provide a sustainable approach to growth by easing congestion in Stratford and directing development to a more suitable location. This method meets housing needs while safeguarding green belt land and preserving the natural environment. With rail connections, including the Honeybourne Line, residents gain access to efficient transport options. Unlike urban expansion, planned settlements allow essential infrastructure such as roads, schools, and healthcare to be integrated from the start, preventing strain on existing services. This ensures well-balanced growth that benefits both communities and the environment.

Yes

Representation ID: 93777

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Minhaz Ali-Bache

This location is suitable because it is
PD1 Spatial Growth Priority Area
PD14 Major Investment Site
Major employment site (spatial growth strategy)
Not green belt
Already part of SDC Core Strategy Development Proposals

Yes

Representation ID: 93837

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

This site is the most suitable of all the new settlements proposed. It is well supported by the existing infrastructure including the B4632. It is accessible to Stratford-upon-Avon with the full provision of services including healthcare, retail, leisure and employment opportunities. The site offers continuation to the current established and successful developments of Meon Vale and Fernleigh Park. The old airfield environment does not include any specific rural habitats which should be protected nor does continued development here result in the loss of any strategically important agriculture businesses. There is also access to Honeybourne railway station for commuter travel.

Yes

Representation ID: 94021

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Senior

All evidence provided shows this is a highly viable site

Yes

Representation ID: 94030

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Clayton

This site has all the potential required for a development of this size. The infrastructure exists the access to major roads and links to the motorway network. This whole area does not encroach on Green Belt and has been neglected for sometime. This development would enhance the whole area and maintain other areas of Green Belt which is desperately required.

Yes

Representation ID: 94072

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

This site is large enough to meet housing needs and provide the necessary infrastructure with minimal disruption to the environment and without worsening air pollution and congestion pressure in Stratford

Yes

Representation ID: 94104

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

This new site could meet all housing needs with least impact on the environment, preserving greenbelt land. It would take transport pressure off Stratford, and new settlements avoid urban sprawl which strains existing infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 94174

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Laura Keating

Already has land available with infrastructure in place and could link directly to the A46 relieving pressure on the town.

Yes

Representation ID: 94194

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Helena Flisowski

This site would compliment the existing new houses in this area and could therefore attract more infrastructure which is needed to sustain a new settlement.

Yes

Representation ID: 94231

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Andrew Close

This location should be considered as a New Town 'planned community' and I hope a new SPD masterplan can be developed to take account of housing and amenities at Meon Vale, Quinton, Pebworth. The final draft SA should reflect these cumulative impacts and opportunities, bringing existing settlements together while protecting their characteristics. As a whole this intervention could deliver around half of the Local Plan 'to find' housing numbers to 2050. Being designated as New Town could bring government investment to unlock the train-line 'spur' so a new station terminus connects to Oxford/London; no need to go onto Stratford.

Yes

Representation ID: 94292

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steve Kirk

If it's really necessary to to have new housing on this scale, the best option would be to create new settlements that will also include the infrastructure needed to support them i.e. offices, doctors surgeries, schools, shops etc. and also the transport links required to support the inevitable commuting and leisure travel.

Long Marston has been designed for this purpose and would provide these benefits with the minimum of time and cost and significantly less negative impact on the existing historically important area around Stratford and other towns and villages

Yes

Representation ID: 94344

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Trevor Pickard

The airfield in not within the Green Belt could possibly be classed as a brown field site and is in fairly close proximity to an existing new development.

Yes

Representation ID: 94352

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Bliss

Much better to use brownfield land than green belt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 94355

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

This would take the congestion pressure off Stratford and avoid urban sprawl. This would not impact on green belt land and have less impact on the environment. There is the potential for a rail connection to the Honeybourne line. The space available means infrastructure like schools and doctors can be built as part of the new settlement.

Yes

Representation ID: 94461

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Tiddington village residents association

Development at this location with appropriate provision of infrastructure would be preferable
It is of a size most likely to get the correct level of infrastructure such as schools ,health provision,shops and community facilities
This would be combined with a river crossing west of stratford to access transport links

Yes

Representation ID: 94482

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Isabel Collins

good road connections and would take the pressure of traffic off Stratford

Yes

Representation ID: 94558

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

The site has major transport issues, and the accompanying evidence which suggests that a major transport infrastructure upgrade is not necessary due to internalisation is considered not tenable. However, this is a potentially sizeable new settlement, and as such could provide a well designed setting for homes and employment. The TTG would support this location , as it is partly developed, if a major transport upgrade is included and implemented in advance.

Yes

Representation ID: 94581

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Benney

A new settlement would be preferable. It could provide the infrastucture required by the new inhabitants, doctors, school, shops etc.
New road links could connect with existing roads and thus keep the extra traffic out of the already congested town centre.

Yes

Representation ID: 94618

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Renny Wodynska

You have already ruined Long Marston so might as well finish the job.

Other

Representation ID: 94768

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

We have insufficient knowledge of the location from which to make an informed comment

Yes

Representation ID: 94786

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

E1 - Long Marston Airfield
The site has major transport issues, and the accompanying evidence which suggests that a major transport infrastructure upgrade is not necessary due to internalisation is considered not tenable. However, this is a potentially sizeable new settlement, and as such could provide a well designed setting for homes and employment. The TTG would support this location , as it is partly developed, if a major transport upgrade is included and implemented in advance.