Yes

Representation ID: 88891

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mr John Singleton

There is the space and topography. Any additional infrastructure required can be built at a much lower cost than in other potential sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 88993

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Subject to the provision of infrastructure BEFORE additional development here

Yes

Representation ID: 89092

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Julie Hudson

The vision here should absolutely be for a garden city with a connection to Honeybourne. I attended the 18 Jan meeting organised by SCA and XR, and was horrified by government assessment requirements that risk always favouring road. I asked a question about carbon pricing in the road study. It is absolutely crucial that a fair comparison is made between road and rail - which means a proper, rounded modelling of costs incl. carbon price scenarios. This needs to be technically very high quality to avoid rejection based on Trump-like reasoning. "Haven't done it before....".

Yes

Representation ID: 89121

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

This is an existing development site capable of further expansion. A renewed financial case needs to be made for restoring the railway the few kilometres north to Stratford - thus providing through access to Birmingham and London via the existing line to Honeybourne.

Yes

Representation ID: 89194

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Suzanna Hughes

New Settlements have to be preferable. The new site has the potential to alleviate congestion in Stratford while addressing housing demands with minimal environmental disruption, protecting Green Belt land. Developing new settlements helps prevent urban sprawl and reduces pressure on existing infrastructure. The area also offers the possibility of a rail link through the Honeybourne Line and rail innovation centre. With sufficient space, key services such as schools and healthcare can be built as part of the community. Planning should focus on strategic opportunities rather than solely on land availability.

No

Representation ID: 89230

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Deborah Lesley Lovett

The Campden Road is already struggling with the current amount of traffic and several surveys have already said that it is near to capacity adding thousands of houses will just add to the problems. Traffic has to cross one of two bridges to reaah main transport links. to access main roads. The promise of an improved infra structure and facilities for the current planned houses has still yet to happen.

Unless a proper bypass is built PRIOR to any houses being built this site is totally unsuitable

Yes

Representation ID: 89437

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Twynam

Agree

No

Representation ID: 89453

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Thomas Jackson

Traffic infrastructure will need significant investment before more houses are added to Meon/Long Marston.

Yes

Representation ID: 89505

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Cara Vanessa Nuhn

Long Marston is a great location for a new settlement as it would have a low impact on the environment. Green Belt land would be preserved and there is space for a large number of houses which would mean that new infrastructure like secondary schools and GP practices could be built. New infrastructure would take the pressure of Stratford and traffic would decrease too. There’s also potential for rail connections to the Honeybourne line.

Yes

Representation ID: 89539

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

This is non green belt land so please prioritise these sites!

Yes

Representation ID: 89616

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robert Smith

Not in greenbelt and a brownfield site - this has to be one of the best options on the table

Yes

Representation ID: 89790

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Julian Sanders

Ex Airfield, good use of brown belt land for redevelopment
The new settlements would be more preferable and suitable
Access to good road connections to the north and south of the area.
Local employment opportunities
Good rail links for those commuting further afield - Banbury, Oxford, London, Birmingham
Helps to the pressure off Stratford Upon Avon of increased traffic congestion, pollution and urban sprawl
Gives opportunity to build new schools, amenities and infrastructure

Yes

Representation ID: 89805

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs SONIA ELLWAY

This would be a far more sensible plan - space to build the necessary infrastructure to support the housing estates you intend to build with minimum disruption

Yes

Representation ID: 89810

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr SIMON BEACHAM

Long Marston and Meon Vale still have scope to expand, however as all sites the road infrastructure and western relief road would need serious review and upgrades. Old abandoned rail lines could be reinstated, but at a high cost.

Yes

Representation ID: 89815

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daphne Davis

I feel a new settlement at Long Marston would be more suitable as it will take the pressure of congestion away from Stratford. It would also meet all the housing needs preserving green belt land. It would avoid urban sprawl that would have an impact on existing infrastructure. With the space available and the number of houses being built it would mean schools, doctors, dentists etc could be included. There could also be the potential for a rail connection.

Yes

Representation ID: 89817

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lina Rodriguez

Long Marston site is ideal for housing. Already a brownfield site is a massive plus !!!
Good potential for a new railway to link up Stratford maybe

Yes

Representation ID: 89862

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Stephen Browett

The amount of space available at this site means that local home-building needs can be adequately covered while also having space to build local amenities such as schools, offices, shops and doctors offices.

There is also potential for new railway line to be introduced connecting to the Honeybourne line.

Development on this land would satisfy housing needs while not needing to develop on green belt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 89867

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

This location would alleviate the pressure on Stratford's congestion, which is already a problem for local residents, and would avoid urban sprawl which is straining existing infrastructure in Stratford.

It could contribute to meeting the housing needs required in Stratford District with the least environmental impact and help to preserve other greenbelt land that has more ecological or historical significance. The size of the location would also allow for integral infrastructure like schools and doctors to be built.

There is also potential for this location to have a rail connection, with the rail innovation centre connecting to the Honeybourne line.

Yes

Representation ID: 89922

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Anders Hagglund

In order to reduce the pressure on central Stratford one alternative, which should be considered in Long Marston. There is already a substantial development there, which should actually benefit from more developments. Thereby a good infrastructure could be established there to the benefit of present and future developments.

Yes

Representation ID: 89927

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Mike Heath

Brown field site ideally suited to expansion

No

Representation ID: 89941

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ema Beattie

Loss of the quiet and beautiful village we currently have. Traffic concerns, it will no longer be a rural area. Also concerns around anti social behaviour, we already have a significant amount of this in Stratford and there are limited jobs so it appears to attract these kind of people. We moved here for the peace and quiet and beautiful surroundings which will be ruined should you fill the area with houses.

No

Representation ID: 89996

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Alastair Manning

Insufficient local infrastructure to handle more homes. Too rural and relies too heavily on car use.

Yes

Representation ID: 90007

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Macvie

The infrastructure of this area is relatively well placed to support new housing developments. As well as jobs in the local area existing road networks and accessibility to the Honeybourne railway line would cope better with an increase in population than the Stratford town infrastructure. Development here would result in less loss of greenbelt land and less urban sprawl.

Yes

Representation ID: 90093

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Katie Walker

An area not within the Green Belt and suitable for repurposing and development.

Yes

Representation ID: 90145

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maria Giblin

New settlement driven by strategic planning not land availability
Allow families to buy houses in the areas they have family close to.

Yes

Representation ID: 90180

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Fox

Already developing as a new Settlement with existing infrastructure. Is Hampered by road access, but this requires resolution today, and extending this new development would enable funding to enable the community to continue to grow. Access to Honeybourne station with its links to employment centres of Oxford / London / Evesham / Worcester, as well as north /south connections at Worcester parkway are a bonus

Yes

Representation ID: 90212

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Williams

Better road infrastructure already in place, A46 area leading to Birmingham road will simply not cope with any more traffic & is already over capacity, I know because I live there & is awful now - this must be considered it's not just about empty green field sites, once the houses go up where are all the cars going to go!!

Yes

Representation ID: 90235

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Giblin

This new site could meet all housing needs with least impact on the environment, preserving greenbelt land o New settlements avoid urban sprawl which strains existing infrastructure Potential for rail connection with the rail innovation centre connecting to the Honeybourne line New settlements can be driven by strategic opportunities not just land availability Taking the congestion pressure off Stratford, this new site could meet all housing needs with minimal environmental impact, preserving greenbelt land. New settlements can avoid urban sprawl, which strains existing infrastructure. There is potential for a rail connection with the rail innovation centre connecting to Honeybourne line.

Yes

Representation ID: 90248

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Stuart Keighley

This should be supported but only on the condition that infrastructure should be provided to support residents of the new development and to mitigate the impacts on the neighbouring existing communities.

Yes

Representation ID: 90292

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Liz Stone

n/a