Object

Representation ID: 42602

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Beryl Dunn

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42604

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Beryl Dunn

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42610

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42612

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42618

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Anthony Hall

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42620

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Anthony Hall

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42626

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Ryan

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42628

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Ryan

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42634

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Igbal Kaur Chhinda

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42636

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Igbal Kaur Chhinda

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42642

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Brogan

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42644

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Brogan

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42650

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42652

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42658

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs David and Mary Mulcahy

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42660

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs David and Mary Mulcahy

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42666

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Philip Archer

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42668

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Philip Archer

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42674

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupiers

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42676

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupiers

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42682

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: N O'Reilly

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42684

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: N O'Reilly

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42690

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42692

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42698

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Chris Hopkins

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42700

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Chris Hopkins

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42706

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: J L Jackson

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42708

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: J L Jackson

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 42714

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Williams

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 42716

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Williams

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.