Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42362
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Anthoney and Sarah Fragola
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42364
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Anthoney and Sarah Fragola
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42370
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R M Voss
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42372
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R M Voss
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42378
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J Heath
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42380
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J Heath
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42386
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupiers
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42388
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupiers
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42394
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Peter and Sandra Cuthbertson
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42396
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Peter and Sandra Cuthbertson
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42402
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: M R Jones
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42404
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: M R Jones
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42410
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: N E Brison
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42412
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: N E Brison
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42418
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: L Lloyd
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42420
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: L Lloyd
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42426
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A M Chambers
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42428
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A M Chambers
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42434
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C Humphriss
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42436
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C Humphriss
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42442
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Attwood
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42444
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Attwood
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42450
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: B Black
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42452
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: B Black
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42458
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Whyte
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42460
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Whyte
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42466
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Canon T Mander
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42468
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Canon T Mander
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42474
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs G E and J A Haynes
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42476
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs G E and J A Haynes
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.