Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42842
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs S and J Arkell
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42844
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs S and J Arkell
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42850
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr G Anderson
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42852
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr G Anderson
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42858
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Willoughby
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42860
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Willoughby
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42866
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: N Murphy
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42868
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: N Murphy
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42874
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R J Calcutt
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42876
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R J Calcutt
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42882
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Rachel Hughes
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42884
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Rachel Hughes
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42890
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs H Williams
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42892
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs H Williams
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42898
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J D Syms
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42900
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J D Syms
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42906
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J G Prosser
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42908
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J G Prosser
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42914
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C Walker
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42916
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C Walker
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42922
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs E Rogers
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42924
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs E Rogers
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42930
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J Taylor
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42932
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J Taylor
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42938
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: K R Hodges
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42940
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: K R Hodges
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42946
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: W Clutton
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42948
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: W Clutton
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42954
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42956
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.