Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42242
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C M Hinton
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42244
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C M Hinton
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42250
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: L J Capper
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42252
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: L J Capper
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42258
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Mullis
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42260
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Mullis
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42266
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: F Monastero
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42268
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: F Monastero
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42274
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs M and A Andrews
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42276
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs M and A Andrews
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42282
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Bazeley
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42284
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Bazeley
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42290
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr David Ashbourne
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42292
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr David Ashbourne
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42298
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42300
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42306
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A K Williams
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42308
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A K Williams
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42314
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Raj Aweai
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42316
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Raj Aweai
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42322
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs B Skinner
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42324
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs B Skinner
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42330
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: P Stoodley
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42332
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: P Stoodley
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42338
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: V Payne
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42340
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: V Payne
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42346
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: M E Allen
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42348
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: M E Allen
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42354
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs P E Hunt
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 42356
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs P E Hunt
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.