Object

Representation ID: 4432

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Johnson

Alternatives:
Public opinion at previous consultation was that Finham was most popular area for new housing - Coventry's infrastructure better.
On campus housing for students would free housing in Leamington.
Brown field development - sites still unused - Peugeot plant at Ryton.

Object

Representation ID: 4464

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mick & Sandra Coulson

Build small building projects in most villages for benefit of growing families who wish to stay in village where they were brought up. Small increase would not have such disasterous effect.

Object

Representation ID: 4468

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Edward Norris

Coventry City Council could find brown field sites within boundary if pushed.

Object

Representation ID: 4475

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Hazel Hier

Do not sell to Coventry for their overspill and avoid devastating the green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 4479

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Brian Hier

Brown field should be developed first and needs careful monitoring to ensure that full capacity is achieved before green belt land considered

Object

Representation ID: 4493

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Declan Mee

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of greenbelt land when it has not been demonstrated that all available brown field sites have been used.

Object

Representation ID: 4504

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E R Matthews

Likely to be more developable land available at Coventry Airport, former Peugeot factory, North Leamington School, other land and redundant factories and areas more accessible to proposed Kenilworth station.

Object

Representation ID: 4511

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A K McArthur

Object to Plan 5:
Lack of robustness during planning process. Infrastructure - allowing developers to implement reasonable infrastructure' appeared to prevail.
Inability to explain probable community demographic to allow for infrastructure requirements to be calculated.
Traffic density assessments were carried out during school holidays - requested deferral until term time. Was this implemented?
Capacity of Longbridge sewage treatment works to cope with increase?
Is there associated strategy for new businesses?
Why does preferred option not reflect public view through earlier consultation?
Suggest:
Much of Grand Union corridor contains derelict, outdated or sub-standard factory/business units - why such opportunities not being adopted?

Object

Representation ID: 4514

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A K McArthur

Much of Grand Union corridor contains derelict, outdated or sub-standard factory/business units - why such opportunities not being adopted?

Support

Representation ID: 4530

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Object

Representation ID: 4538

Received: 19/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Object to concentrating proposed housing sites to south of Warwick and Leamington.
Infrastructure: pressure on schools, hospitals, utility services. Europa Way and Myton Road extremely congested at peak times. Traffic modelling took place during school holiday period when traffic low. Parking at Leamington station limited and not planned to expand. Flooding of homes from field run-off which will be exacerbated by more houses.
Object to reasons for new build in this area - availablility of land and willingness of developers.
Those responsible for planning have duty of care to preserve quality of life for existing as well as future residents.
Any distinction between two towns will be lost.
Why is current area of restraint one of the first rather than one of the last to be developed?
Land is becoming available at Coventry airport and North Leamington School and seems logical to include these so that the burden is spread.

Object

Representation ID: 4542

Received: 19/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Land is becoming available at Coventry airport and North Leamington School and seems logical to include these so that the burden is spread.

Object

Representation ID: 4569

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Lomax

Finham residents enjoy being on edge of countryside - brown field sites should be developed first before eating into precious green belt.

Support

Representation ID: 4593

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Object

Representation ID: 4614

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Verrier

Development should not be concentrated in area with so much new development.
New houses should be at Finham which would benefit students and free up significant number of houses in Leamington. Should not be releasing land to Coventry but develop for Warwick. Coventry would still have economic benefits of having district residents using their facilities.
Consider developing small housing devt. at Hatton Park and put other housing around small pockets of land to spread impact.
New home building should be on brownfield sites as a priority.

Object

Representation ID: 4643

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: P M Slater

Plenty of run down brown field sites in Coventry which could be developed first. Why ruin green belt when there are dilapidated areas in the city?

Object

Representation ID: 4655

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Rock

Hope powers that be look for brown field site. Coventry has many areas where rejuvenation is badly needed.

Support

Representation ID: 4667

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Greenbelt land should be avoided.

Object

Representation ID: 4683

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Miremadi

Many other locations within Leamington that should be considered for building and large scale developments should be located close to Coventry to take advantage of amenities and employment opportunities.

Object

Representation ID: 4699

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Pritchard

Don't want to leave the Coventry but job propects are poor and others are moving away. Houses not therefore required.

Object

Representation ID: 4703

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: S Bradley

Object to 8100 council dwellings on doorstep. Property value has already dropped due to economic climate. Hoping for increased value after recession but values of all property will drop if this goes ahead.
More havoc on roads, more traffic, more noise, more pollution.
Council tax will increase and is already extortionate.
Schools cannot cope with increased population and Brittain Lane cannot cope with more schools, roads and houses.

Object

Representation ID: 4738

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Miss M S Saben

Object to Kings Hill site:
Areas better suited near to public transport facilities e.g. Warwick Parkway

Object

Representation ID: 4743

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: V J Evans

Object to Kings Hill site:
Mistake to put all development in one area. Will change character of that part of the town. Development should be spread more equally around the town. This would help the existing infrastructure to absorb new developments.

Comment

Representation ID: 4748

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Richard Whidborne

Suggest 'Sunset villages' relevant to housing programme in district.

Object

Representation ID: 4755

Received: 02/10/2009

Respondent: Cllr Bob Dhillon and family

Object to building houses south of Warwick:
Why not buillding on brown field before green field?

Comment

Representation ID: 4768

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr L Morris

Essential green belt is maintained. Natural habitat for wildlife. Green areas, wood and forests are lungs of the planet and destruction would add to climate change not reduce it as cannot dictate to people where they will work - where are jobs anyway?
Schools and transport will have to be considered. Demand increased by more houses. Level of traffic along Stoneleigh Road, A45 and A46 at peak times is immense - further traffic add to chaos. Cannot see how introduction of roads into new development will ease situation, as will ultimately flow into existing.
Do not need to build more houses for increased immigration when there is lost generation of school leavers not earning or learning new skills.
Should be training young people new skills for jobs that will be available at end of recession. Birth rates rising and life expectancy increasing but this may reverse.
Affordable housing will increase in value, will government then expect new affordable housing to be built? Too many people dealing with debt, repossession of property and loss of jobs. The answer is not to build more houses especially not on the green belt.
With loss of passenger flights and extension of runway at Birmingham airport, surely Coventry no longer needs an airport and has motorway network and major trunk roads nearby and is brown field.
Land available at North Leamington Community School is not in Core Strategy, but should be considered for Coventry overspill. Where overspill not able to be accommodated to the south of Coventry, it should be directed to nearest urban area - this means development on the edge of Kenilworth and possibly some on north side of Leamington and Warwick.

Object

Representation ID: 4778

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Hunt

Object to 8100 new houses in Warwick District:
Already suffered adversely from significant housing developments in recent years, exerting pressure on services and infrastructure.
No plan for infrastructure in terms of drainage, sewage, roads, public transport, schools, hospitals, maintaining towns individual identities and preservation of wildlife. No new schools built, hence overpopulated existing schools. Hospitals do not have capacity to serve increased population.

Object

Representation ID: 4798

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Dr Martin Le Tocq

Adding further 25,000 population over next ten years can only have further adverse impact on living environment.
10,800 new homes imposed and no attempt made to resist.
Much demand from outward migration from nearby conurbations where many new residents will contine to work further burdening transport infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 4807

Received: 18/10/2009

Respondent: Ian Frost

No I believe the area around the airport should be looked at because there will be employment growth on the site of the former Peugeot plant.

Object

Representation ID: 4817

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Nigel Warden

Vast amounts of brown field land in Coventry which should be decontaminated and developed for housing or industrial use where utilities and infrastructure more readily to hand.