Object

Representation ID: 34188

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Bhurji

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Representation ID: 34191

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Illsley

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Representation ID: 34195

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Illsley

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Representation ID: 34196

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Illsley

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Representation ID: 34199

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Melissa and Tom Horrocks

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Representation ID: 34203

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Melissa and Tom Horrocks

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Representation ID: 34204

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Melissa and Tom Horrocks

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Representation ID: 34209

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs P Pounds

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34217

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Roger White

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34225

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Rob Mitchell

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34233

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: L Clarke

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34241

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs S O'Connor

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34249

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Natalie Porter

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34257

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Hewitt

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34265

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Maria Garcia

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34273

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Mason

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34281

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34289

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Walters

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34297

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr G F Eve

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34305

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Neil Kenton

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34313

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M J Giles

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34321

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs S J Humphrey

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34329

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Woods

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34337

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: A & J Jones

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34345

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Hilary and Dale Fittes

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34353

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs B.V. & P.R. Bugg

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34361

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Cyril Pearce

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34369

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Cecilia Parker

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34377

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Paul & Luisa Hodge

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area

Object

Representation ID: 34385

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Anthony Gregg

Objection to the lack of dispersal of planned growth - growth is focussed entirely in the area south of Leamington. This area has already been developed significantly in recent years - options would result in over development of this area