Showing comments and forms 511 to 540 of 2127

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34108

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Natasha Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34111

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Karl Cosnett

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34115

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Karl Cosnett

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34116

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Karl Cosnett

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34119

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Joshua Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34123

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Joshua Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34124

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Joshua Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34127

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kuldip Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34131

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kuldip Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34132

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kuldip Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34135

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34139

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34140

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34143

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Avtar Bains

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34147

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Avtar Bains

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34148

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Avtar Bains

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34151

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34155

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34156

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34159

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ripanjit Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34163

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ripanjit Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34164

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ripanjit Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34167

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mitra Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34171

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mitra Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34172

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mitra Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34175

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Bhurji

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34179

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Bhurji

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34180

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Bhurji

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34183

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Bhurji

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34187

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Bhurji

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.