Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34108
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Natasha Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34111
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Karl Cosnett
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34115
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Karl Cosnett
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34116
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Karl Cosnett
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34119
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Joshua Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34123
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Joshua Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34124
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Joshua Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34127
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kuldip Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34131
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kuldip Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34132
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kuldip Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34135
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Onkar Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34139
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Onkar Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34140
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Onkar Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34143
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Avtar Bains
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34147
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Avtar Bains
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34148
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Avtar Bains
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34151
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34155
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34156
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34159
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Ripanjit Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34163
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Ripanjit Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34164
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Ripanjit Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34167
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mitra Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34171
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mitra Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34172
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mitra Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34175
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs R Bhurji
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34179
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs R Bhurji
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34180
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs R Bhurji
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34183
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr S Bhurji
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34187
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr S Bhurji
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.