Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34028
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Alison Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34031
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kamalpreet Badesha
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34035
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kamalpreet Badesha
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34036
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kamalpreet Badesha
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34039
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Francesca Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34043
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Francesca Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34044
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Francesca Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34047
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Richard Fathers
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34051
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Richard Fathers
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34052
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Richard Fathers
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34055
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kully Fathers
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34059
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kully Fathers
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34060
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Kully Fathers
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34063
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Amrik Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34067
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Amrik Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34068
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Amrik Mann
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34071
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Charlotte Fathers
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34075
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Charlotte Fathers
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34076
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Charlotte Fathers
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34079
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr N Cheema
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34083
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr N Cheema
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34084
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr N Cheema
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34087
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs R Sandhu
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34091
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs R Sandhu
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34092
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs R Sandhu
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34095
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr J Mundy
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34099
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr J Mundy
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34100
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr J Mundy
Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34103
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Natasha Mann
If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 34107
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Natasha Mann
Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.