Showing comments and forms 481 to 510 of 2127

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34028

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Alison Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34031

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kamalpreet Badesha

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34035

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kamalpreet Badesha

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34036

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kamalpreet Badesha

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34039

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Francesca Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34043

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Francesca Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34044

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Francesca Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34047

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Fathers

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34051

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Fathers

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34052

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Fathers

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34055

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kully Fathers

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34059

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kully Fathers

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34060

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kully Fathers

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34063

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Amrik Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34067

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Amrik Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34068

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Amrik Mann

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34071

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Charlotte Fathers

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34075

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Charlotte Fathers

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34076

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Charlotte Fathers

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34079

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr N Cheema

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34083

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr N Cheema

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34084

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr N Cheema

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34087

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Sandhu

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34091

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Sandhu

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34092

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs R Sandhu

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34095

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr J Mundy

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34099

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr J Mundy

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34100

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr J Mundy

Representation Summary:

Areas proposed to the south already suffer with overstretched services and infrastructure. The urban fringe south of Coventry or land at Baginton should be used - why isn't land at Finham being used for the District's needs instead of Coventry's overspill.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34103

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Natasha Mann

Representation Summary:

If there is a need for social housing why is growth being focused around the rural edges to the south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash when people living in social housing need easy access to town centre facilities. Areas to the north of the district (Kenilworth, North Leamington, Cubbington, Lillington, Milverton, North Warwick and West Warwick) would be more suitable for additional high density housing as there is easier access to the centres.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 34107

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Natasha Mann

Representation Summary:

Additional housing growth for Kenilworth should be reconsidered due to the pending railway station. Why are the houses not dispersed over the district? Some housing should be allocated to rural areas to encourage a change in demographics and ensure rural services are sustained.