RS1 - Securing a suitable mix of housing types, tenures and sizes in new developments
Support
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71803
Received: 11/07/2020
Respondent: Mr G Wyatt
We agree that housing needs within the village have been met and, indeed, exceeded. The village is now very large and compact, therefore a crowded built environment. Any further development would strain the villages restricted resources and reduce the quality of life in many ways, as outlined in the document.
We agree that housing needs within the village have been met and, indeed, exceeded. The village is now very large and compact, therefore a crowded built environment. Any further development would strain the villages restricted resources and reduce the quality of life in many ways, as outlined in the document.
Support
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71837
Received: 04/08/2020
Respondent: Mrs
Good quality social housing should be provided for villagers. Potentially also sheltered accommodation.
Good quality social housing should be provided for villagers. Potentially also sheltered accommodation.
Object
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71845
Received: 05/08/2020
Respondent: Mrs Linda Simons
Any future housing development considerations for a village that is already saturated and lacking in infrastructure is totally ridiculous. I moved into the village over 20 years ago and have seen its gradual demise and I do not want to live in a small town lookalike. There are plenty of brown site development opportunities in Leamington Spa.
Any future housing development considerations for a village that is already saturated and lacking in infrastructure is totally ridiculous. I moved into the village over 20 years ago and have seen its gradual demise and I do not want to live in a small town lookalike. There are plenty of brown site development opportunities in Leamington Spa.
Support
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71858
Received: 05/08/2020
Respondent: Mrs Karen Price
I agree with the policy with some reservations as I am not sure what some of the wording implies. In the interests of being carbon neutral I would suggest greening of the village itself with incentives or encouragements for the villagers to re-green the area by planting and replacing the trees and shrubs that are slowly being cut down and removed.
I agree with the policy with some reservations as I am not sure what some of the wording implies. In the interests of being carbon neutral I would suggest greening of the village itself with incentives or encouragements for the villagers to re-green the area by planting and replacing the trees and shrubs that are slowly being cut down and removed.
Support
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71876
Received: 10/08/2020
Respondent: Miss Louise Milling
Sufficient new housing has now been added to Radford. Further building would remove the village characteristics and cannot be sustained with current infrastructure and amenities
Sufficient new housing has now been added to Radford. Further building would remove the village characteristics and cannot be sustained with current infrastructure and amenities
Support
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71893
Received: 12/08/2020
Respondent: Mr Parvinder Singh Dhillon
I also agree that the housing needs within the area have been met and exceeded.
I also agree that the housing needs within the area have been met and exceeded.
Support
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71902
Received: 14/08/2020
Respondent: Mr Oliver Aries
Radford semele has accomodated 300+ houses in the current Plan period. This vastly exceeds the numbers allocated to the village by a factor of 3 and exceeds the the Housing Survey which stated the village needed 6. The accomodation of these high numbers should exclude Radford Semele as a growth village for forseable future.
Support mixed sustainable housing in keeping with local area.
I support this Policy in line with Local Plan Policy. Radford Semele has recently accomodated housing numbers far in excess that allocated in the current Local Planfor the village (>X3). The housing needs survey stated that Radford needed 7 houses of mixed types. The local Plan allocated 100 with 40% afordable housing. The village has in fact been allocated 300+. This excess development should exclude Radford Semele as a growth village for the forseable future.
It is important that housing should be in keeping with its surrounding and built to nationally approved specifications, whilst accomodating all sectors of the population which needs housing. I would support housing designed for disabled people and of a sustainable nature utilising energy sources from sustainable sources such as solar, hydrogen etc.
Support
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Representation ID: 71982
Received: 28/05/2020
Respondent: Severn Trent Water
Severn Trent is supportive of Policy RS1, in particular the inclusion of the comment that new housing must meet WDC Climate Emergency Commitment which should encourage water efficiency and use of SuDS. We would recommend that specific mention relating to water efficiency is made here through the incorporation of a policy for new developments to be built to the water efficiency standard of 110 litres per person per day.
Please see attached.