H27 Hampton Magna - South of Arras Boulevard

Object

Representation ID: 65324

Received: 25/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Ben Davis

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The land at Hampton Magna is green belt and "exceptional circumstances" need to be justified to allow development.
The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics show a population projection for Warwick district which is 29% lower than the estimates used on which the local plan is based and therefore around 3,700 fewer homes are required. The current plan is not based on sound evidence and building on green belt land can not be justified.

Object

Representation ID: 65334

Received: 25/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Carl Stevens

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The village will struggle to sustain the houses proposed - the sewerage system is terrible (well known) and electricity/water systems also have issues. The school will not have the capacity to teach the numbers involved and has had issues recently. Decisions are driven by a closed approach by planners to the residents voices in the consultation process. Wildlife including bats exist on the site. Redrawing the village envelope to the beautiful southern flank of the village is a crime against community our heritage. Importantly as green belt land its against NPPF policy in that exceptional circumstances have not been proven.

Object

Representation ID: 65344

Received: 25/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Carl Stevens

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The proposed sight is in an area of particular countryside open aspect beauty to which little or no consideration has been given

Object

Representation ID: 65405

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Lee Jackson-Clarke

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

My representation is the same as representation submitted by Hampton Magna Residents association of a copy of which I have seen.
Plus we are directly adjacent to the plot of land to be developed hence believe compensation is forth coming due to reduction in property evaluation suggest land allotted equal to our present plot for our self build. Previously stated on earlier submission.

Object

Representation ID: 65406

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Dene Jackson-Clarke

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

My representation is the same as representation submitted by Hampton Magna Residents association of a copy of which I have seen.
Plus we are directly adjacent to the plot of land to be developed hence believe compensation is forth coming due to reduction in property valuation suggest land allotted equal to our present plot for our self build. Previously stated on earlier submission.

Support

Representation ID: 65474

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: King Henry VIII Endowed Trust (Warwick)

Agent: AMEC

We support this recommendation and the Council's decision to allocate the site for development under Policy DS11 in the Draft Local Plan; site reference H27 'Hampton Magna - South of Arras Boulevard'.
It is the Trust's considered view that not only is Hampton Magna a suitable location for additional growth, we strongly believe that the village can benefit greatly from well planned development of an appropriate scale.

Furthermore from our own Green Belt appraisal and baseline assessment of the site's development potential, we consider that land South of Arras Boulevard is not only a logical location for new development at Hampton Magna but the best site.

The Trust can also confirm that not only does the site offer a suitable location for development now, but it is also viable and achievable, with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on site within five years.

Object

Representation ID: 65676

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Les Powell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Objects to site. The road structure in this area was not built for commercial use, all three roads into the site are subject to height and weight restrictions causing access difficulties. Would result in additional cars on these roads. The field in question reaps a regular harvest and the hedgerows are of considerable value to local wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 66709

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Miss L R Vickers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66854

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mrs Carol Cross

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66857

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Dene Jackson-Clarke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66860

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Bob Davis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66863

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Bickerstaff

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66866

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Stephen Pilkington

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66869

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Robert Sutton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66872

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Miss Louise Wilson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66875

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Frank Roper

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66878

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Hampton Magna Residents' Association

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66881

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: mr clive fennell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66884

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mrs Pamela J Sutton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66887

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Linda I Pearce

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66890

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Anne Pilkington

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66893

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: L H Powell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66896

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Brian Robert Pearce

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 66899

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Lee Jackson-Clarke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 67130

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Kevin Olney

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Traffic and Transport: The proposals fails to address the increased traffic and congestion for Hampton Magna. The proposals will have a negative impact on the Stanks Island junction. there is already significant congestion to and from Budbroke at peak times due to the nature of the roads in and out of the village. Old Budbrooke Lane becomes a single lane under the railway bridge and this is controlled by a four way alternating traffic light system. The alternative access is through Hampton on the Hill but this is subject to narrow access points. The overall effect is that at peak times traffic congestion and delays are experienced. The proposals for 100 additional houses will exacerbate this and are likely to lead to gridlock. The plan does not therefore adequately address access to this site. It is therefore likely to have consequential impacts. This will also adversely impact on public transport journeys at peak times. Further, this could impact on emergency vehicle access. Together with increased noise and air pollution this will have a negative impact on health and well being and cannot be considered sustainable development. The Plan has not demonstrated compliance with NPPF para 32 as the transport assessment is not realistic. The Plan recognises congestion as a significant issue. The strategic transport assessment considers the reduction of traffic queues but does not show how this will enable safe and suitable access to and from Budbrooke village at peak times. This means the plan is not positively prepared, effective nor consistent with national policy.

Utilities: The Plan does not adequately address the infrastructure requirements of this site in relation to utilities. Issues regarding electricity supply and sewage have been raise previously, but there is no evidence as to how this is being addressed. If assessments have been made, then this should be published and scrutinised before the approval of the Local Plan. The existing drainage, sewerage and electricity systems cannot cope with the proposed housing. The IDP is not fully funded and cannot therefore demonstrate that the proposals are deliverable.

Schools: This site is not the most appropriate strategy as proportionate evidence has not been taken in to account as demonstrated by the SA which state that the capacity of existing services is unknown. However previous reps have explained that Budbroke school is struggling with numbers due to rising population. The additional houses will put a further strain on the school. The plan does not recognise this issue or resolve it and the proposals are therefore not sustainable or justified.