Plan Period
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65231
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd
Agent: Delta Planning
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Deeley Group object to the Plan period of 2011- 2029. It is considered that the plan period should be extended from 2029 to 2031. The current approach is considered 'unsound' as it does not conform with the provisions of NPPF which requires Plans to cover an appropriate time period, preferably a 15 year time horizon but which takes account of longer term requirements.
Deeley Group object to the Plan period of 2011- 2029. It is considered that the plan period should be extended from 2029 to 2031. The current approach is considered 'unsound' as it does not conform with the provisions of NPPF which requires Plans to a to cover an appropriate time period, preferably a 15 year time horizon but which takes account of longer term requirements. Since the Plan is unlikely to be adopted before 2015 this period appears too short. Extending the period to 2031 would ensure a 15 year period is provided for and also bring the plan into line with the housing evidence base i.e. the Joint Coventry and Warwickshire SHMA that has been used to consider housing allocations. This document makes provision for housing between 2011 and 2031.
Stratford on Avon District Council, a neighbouring Authority which has also just published its Proposed Submission Core Strategy, has extended its plan period to 2031 in recognition of this position and has noted that its plan could run the risk of being found 'unsound' at examination unless a period to 2031 was provided for.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65261
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: A C Lloyd Homes Ltd
Agent: Delta Planning
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A C Lloyd Homes object to the Plan period of 2011- 2029. It is considered that the plan period should be extended from 2029 to 2031. The current approach is considered 'unsound' as it does not conform with the provisions of NPPF which requires Plans to cover an appropriate time period, preferably a 15 year time horizon, but which takes account of longer term requirements.
A C Lloyd Homes object to the Plan period of 2011- 2029. It is considered that the plan period should be extended from 2029 to 2031. The current approach is considered 'unsound' as it does not conform with the provisions of NPPF which requires Plans to cover an appropriate time period, preferably a 15 year time horizon, but which takes account of longer term requirements. Since the plan is unlikely to be adopted before 2015 this period appears too short. Extending the period to 2031 would ensure a 15 year period is provided for and also bring the plan into line with the housing evidence base i.e. the Joint Coventry and Warwickshire SHMA that has been used to consider housing allocations. This document makes provision for housing between 2011 and 2031.
Stratford on Avon District Council, a neighbouring Authority which has also just published its Proposed Submission Core Strategy, has extended its plan period to 2031 in recognition of this position and has noted that its plan could run the risk of being found 'unsound' at examination unless a period to 2031 was provided for.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65325
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Carl Stevens
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Projecting housing needs so far into the future when other professional bodies have questioned the perceived number of houses is unreliable
Projecting housing needs so far into the future when other professional bodies have questioned the perceived number of houses is unreliable
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65420
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Mrs J Mackenzie
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Plan Period
Plan Period
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65717
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: Sir Thomas White's Charity & King Henry VIII Endowed Trust
Agent: Stansgate Planning
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
NPPF (para 157) requires Local Plans to be drawn up over an appropriate period which should preferably be 15 years from the date of adoption. Assuming adoption is 12 months after submission to the Secretary of State, adoption is likely to be in the second half of 2015. The plan period would then be less than 15 years.
see attached
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66398
Received: 30/06/2014
Respondent: The Warwick Society
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The NPPF, quoted at para 1.7, prefers that the Plan should be drawn up over a 15 year period. This Plan (para 1.29) covers the 18 years 2011 to 2029.
see attached