Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Historic Environment?

Support

Representation ID: 5547

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5593

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

WDC should look to introduce appropriate design guides for the appropriate refurbishment and repair of buildings and most especially as buildings are made more energy efficient - e.g. replacement windows etc. Consideration should also be given to including recommendations for the use of appropriate materials.

Support

Representation ID: 5676

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5726

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

I think extending conservation areas, and adopting 'a more stringent approach' would be valuable.

Support

Representation ID: 5786

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Fully support any plans to protect and maintain historic gardens both as an historic record but also as a living example for gardeners of all ages eg Warwick's Lord Leycester Hospital Victorian garden

Support

Representation ID: 5827

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5865

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5943

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

but undeveloped land needs to be protected from development which has serviced in it historical state. These open areas are just as important at the built environment.

Support

Representation ID: 6012

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6045

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6144

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Object

Object

Representation ID: 6224

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6285

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Support

Object

Representation ID: 6367

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 6463

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

support

Support

Representation ID: 6747

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Object

Representation ID: 6961

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

In addition to adding the requirement above the Preferred Options Paper should be more specific about how it was balance „carrot and stick‟. We do not support the Council‟s Preferred Option.

Support

Representation ID: 7020

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Supported in principle but concerned at application

Object

Representation ID: 7601

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Object

Support

Representation ID: 7617

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Coal Pension Properties Ltd

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Support in principle, a balanced approach is the most appropriate. However, requirements to enhance the historic environment should not stifle economic development. The approach should be commercially minded whilst enhancing and protecting this special environment.

Support

Representation ID: 33691

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Object

Representation ID: 33737

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Sharba Homes

Agent: PJPlanning

The choice is not between confrontation and partnership, national guidance needs to be applied sensitively and appropriately.

Support

Representation ID: 33840

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support