Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Historic Environment?

Support

Representation ID: 2767

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Encourage local landowners to maintain aspects of the historic environment and encourage restoration of historic sites e.g the new Elizabethan gardens restored at Kenilworth Castle.

Support

Representation ID: 2810

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2854

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2893

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 3108

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3294

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Support

Representation ID: 3320

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3347

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3415

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3491

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Kings Hill Lane contains ancient woodland and hedgerows and should not be developed.

Object

Representation ID: 3586

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Object

Representation ID: 3588

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Support

Representation ID: 3722

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Supported.

Support

Representation ID: 3762

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4084

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

approach seems reasonable

Support

Representation ID: 4382

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4453

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 4560

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4630

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4725

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Support

Representation ID: 4895

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5003

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

SUPPORT in principle, subjext to details of delivery strategy.

Support

Representation ID: 5169

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5233

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 5268

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

support

Support

Representation ID: 5307

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

As expressed, clauses 16.12 to 16.14 appear to meet the above-mentioned criteria.

Object

Representation ID: 5362

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Support

Representation ID: 5414

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5454

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

The preferred option sounds like a detached aspect. This is the Core Strategy and it should be made clear that the Council will take a view on any of the proposed developments before granting permissions.

Support

Representation ID: 5488

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Support the first alternative "greater use of Article Four Directions ...more direct use of enforcement powers in restoring or replacing elements of historic buildings, extended Conservation Areas" and greater use of local lists of buildings and gardens. The historic environment contributes to people's sense of social and cultural identity and is vital to tourism in this area. Visitors don't come here for sunshine, the seaside or skiing etc. They come to see our history.