Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Historic Environment?

Support

Representation ID: 241

Received: 09/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Duncan Hurwood

I don't think the council with have to do anything here, but the approach seems correct.

Object

Representation ID: 381

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 457

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 509

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 580

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 643

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 732

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 803

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 934

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 1016

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1106

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1142

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1204

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1269

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Incomplete
NB: Whitnash has ancient sites and buildings - is the Whitnash environment being considered or is this a secondary consideration after Leamington and Warwick?

Object

Representation ID: 1328

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

What about the Saxon, Stuart sites and buildings in Whitnash. Are they protected like the Leamington and Warwick ones?

Support

Representation ID: 1394

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1529

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

The Conservation areas need to be reviewed and enlarged.

Perhaps far more parkland should be included such as St Mary Lands in Warwick which date back over 750 years and are under threat from a leaseholder- Racecourse Investments Ltd -wishing to build a large budget hotel which will impact on the landscape and is largely irrelevant to the running of a successful racecourse. Views that have existed for hundreds and in one case over 1 thousand years would be lost, for short term commercial gain.

This is an example of piecemeal damage to our historic environment.

Support

Representation ID: 1578

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

16b We at BLAST fully support any plans to protect and maintain historic gardens both as an historic record but also as a living example for gardeners of all ages eg Warwick's Lord Leycester Hospital Victorian garden

Object

Representation ID: 1713

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1860

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1897

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Not enough information.

Support

Representation ID: 1960

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Support

Representation ID: 2088

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

Supported in general terms however, specific mention of historic open spaces should also be included. As an example, St. Mary's Lands, (also referred to as Warwick Common), is part of the local heritage but could be open to 'commercial' exploitation if not 'protected'. Extending, (or creating), a 'Conervation Area' here would ensure more detailed consideration would be required before any exploitation took place.

Support

Representation ID: 2196

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2345

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2457

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2516

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Historic canals not are included within Conservation Areas in Warwick District. This key industrial heritage is an integral part of the landscape within the countryside surrounding villages and towns. Kingswood Junction/Lapworth locks and the Hatton Lock flight are renown features of the canal system.

WDC should consider the possibility of conservation area designation for the South Stratford and Grand Union Canals with other LPAs. The intrinsic value of the canal and its historic buildings are irreplaceable assets. Careful conservation management of the canals will ensure the preservation of historic buildings, structures and textures and control development along the corridor.

Support

Representation ID: 2574

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2652

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2702

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Support.