Do you support or object to the preferred criteria for selecting the location of gypsy and traveller sites?

Object

Representation ID: 7599

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Object

Object

Representation ID: 7736

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

The diversity introduced to a locality by a Gypsies and Travellers community will naturally have impact on adjacent non- traveling communities. Should be recognized towns, with larger communities and more plentiful facilities would be better able to support this type of development. New criteria should be adopted to support reflect this.

Object

Representation ID: 7737

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Normal communities are naturally cautious about travellers and consider that threat of travelers is high priority in Community Safety Programme with threat of crime, begging, drug-selling and general generation of litter and worse left in sites they visit to say nothing of tax evasion either on incomes or Council tax. Few people wish to see them in vicinity or even miles away. Stabilising the situation by providing permanent sites means that problem doesn't go away whereas travelers are at least moved on.
Provision of sites encourages travelers to remain in that way of life.

Object

Representation ID: 7738

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Why 11 permanent and 15 temporary in Warwick District? Are we expecting whole of Eastern Europe to turn up? This quantity should be resisted at all costs. Where possible, travelers should be weaned away from that way of life to reduce problem to rest of us and help pay their way in society.

Object

Representation ID: 33773

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Should include reference to previously developed land.

Support

Representation ID: 33838

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33937

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Supports criteria