Do you support or object to the preferred criteria for selecting the location of gypsy and traveller sites?
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5230
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Sonia Owczarek
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5265
Received: 23/10/2009
Respondent: Lindsay Wood
Object to tax payers providing this.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5305
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: J. N. Price
Although the policy as stated expresses a clear definition of the supposed requirements, seems clear that there has not been adequate consultation with the affected groups to establish their views of what is needed and where. These omissions need to be rectified before the matter is further
progressed.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5360
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: SEAN DEELY
No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5412
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: John Baxter
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5452
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mike Cheeseman
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5486
Received: 27/09/2009
Respondent: Joanna Illingworth
The District needs sites for residential caravans and touring caravans regardless of so called ethnic originset. If there were enough of them there would be no need for special provision for "gypsies and travelers".
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5545
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan
Number of people: 2
We should not have any sites for this use. Gypsies and travellers should be discouraged and NOT encouraged from living that way.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5590
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: George Martin
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5674
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: Jane Boynton
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5722
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Roger Warren
I see no reason to make such provision.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5784
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Philip Wilson
There will always be travellers and reasonable sites should be provided for those who are proven to be transient and not just vagrant looking for an easy option.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5825
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Alison Cox
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5941
Received: 28/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts
Provided normal planning rules are followed.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6010
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Debbie Harris
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6043
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Paul Skidmore
I cannot understand how our taxes are paying for and improving amenities of people who decide to live by a law to themselves and don't pay anything into the pot.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6092
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6143
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow
Number of people: 2
Object
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6161
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Barry & Valerie Sankey
Number of people: 2
The countryside provides one of the few employment opportunities for unskilled and seasonal work.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6222
Received: 13/10/2009
Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis
Object
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6283
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Ross Telford
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6334
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle
Providing there is a charge that is paid to the relevant council for provision of utilities - water, toliet,etc, plus schooling and GP access as we all have to pay high council taxes for these services. A pre-paid charge should be set in place, particularly for cleaning up the sites once the gypsies have left. This would help alleviate any animosity towards them.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6365
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: John Jessamine
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6461
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: graham leeke
The number of sites indicated is too many.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6722
Received: 05/11/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Heritage & Culture (Museums)
We support the inclusion of avoidance of adverse impact on the historic environment as a criterion.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6745
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6959
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council
Gypsies & Travellers
The diversity introduced to a locality by a Gypsies and Traveller community will naturally have an impact on adjacent non- traveling communities. It should be recognized that towns, with their larger communities and more plentiful facilities would be better able to support this type of development. A new criteria should be adopted to support and reflect this. The Parish Council supports the criteria for selection in the Preferred Option.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7018
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported in general terms but most difficult to meet the criteria with local agreement.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7134
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Environment & Economy Directorate
We feel that the wording around Gypsy and Traveller sites in Section 15 is non committal and is required to be more robust. The criteria based option for gypsy and travellers could make it impossible for a site to be provided especially when consideration is given to noise and nuisance. There is always the possibility of questions being asked as to whether this would be the same for affordable housing of the settled community. It could be difficult to decide on the measurement of this and by whom and this criteria could be challenged in a court of law and potentially found to be unsound. Government guidance is to avoid just a criteria based approach to allocations.
Consideration should also be given to identifying areas of land and acknowledgement given to the fact that this will need to be provided by January 2013.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7517
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Government Office for the West Midlands
It is unclear which DPD will allocate specific sites for gypsies and travellers and the timescale for the preparation of this.