Do you support or object to the preferred criteria for selecting the location of gypsy and traveller sites?

Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 97

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5230

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5265

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Representation Summary:

Object to tax payers providing this.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5305

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Representation Summary:

Although the policy as stated expresses a clear definition of the supposed requirements, seems clear that there has not been adequate consultation with the affected groups to establish their views of what is needed and where. These omissions need to be rectified before the matter is further
progressed.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5360

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Representation Summary:

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5412

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5452

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5486

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Representation Summary:

The District needs sites for residential caravans and touring caravans regardless of so called ethnic originset. If there were enough of them there would be no need for special provision for "gypsies and travelers".

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5545

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

We should not have any sites for this use. Gypsies and travellers should be discouraged and NOT encouraged from living that way.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5590

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5674

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5722

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Representation Summary:

I see no reason to make such provision.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5784

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Representation Summary:

There will always be travellers and reasonable sites should be provided for those who are proven to be transient and not just vagrant looking for an easy option.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5825

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5941

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Representation Summary:

Provided normal planning rules are followed.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6010

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6043

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Representation Summary:

I cannot understand how our taxes are paying for and improving amenities of people who decide to live by a law to themselves and don't pay anything into the pot.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6092

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6143

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Object

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6161

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Barry & Valerie Sankey

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

The countryside provides one of the few employment opportunities for unskilled and seasonal work.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6222

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6283

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6334

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

Representation Summary:

Providing there is a charge that is paid to the relevant council for provision of utilities - water, toliet,etc, plus schooling and GP access as we all have to pay high council taxes for these services. A pre-paid charge should be set in place, particularly for cleaning up the sites once the gypsies have left. This would help alleviate any animosity towards them.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6365

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6461

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Representation Summary:

The number of sites indicated is too many.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6722

Received: 05/11/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Heritage & Culture (Museums)

Representation Summary:

We support the inclusion of avoidance of adverse impact on the historic environment as a criterion.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6745

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6959

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Gypsies & Travellers
The diversity introduced to a locality by a Gypsies and Traveller community will naturally have an impact on adjacent non- traveling communities. It should be recognized that towns, with their larger communities and more plentiful facilities would be better able to support this type of development. A new criteria should be adopted to support and reflect this. The Parish Council supports the criteria for selection in the Preferred Option.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7018

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Supported in general terms but most difficult to meet the criteria with local agreement.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7134

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Environment & Economy Directorate

Representation Summary:

We feel that the wording around Gypsy and Traveller sites in Section 15 is non committal and is required to be more robust. The criteria based option for gypsy and travellers could make it impossible for a site to be provided especially when consideration is given to noise and nuisance. There is always the possibility of questions being asked as to whether this would be the same for affordable housing of the settled community. It could be difficult to decide on the measurement of this and by whom and this criteria could be challenged in a court of law and potentially found to be unsound. Government guidance is to avoid just a criteria based approach to allocations.

Consideration should also be given to identifying areas of land and acknowledgement given to the fact that this will need to be provided by January 2013.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7517

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Government Office for the West Midlands

Representation Summary:

It is unclear which DPD will allocate specific sites for gypsies and travellers and the timescale for the preparation of this.