Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Open Space?

Showing comments and forms 91 to 120 of 125

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5538

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5583

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5669

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Representation Summary:

Parks, gardens, allotments must be protected and further expanded in line with future housing developments.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5716

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Representation Summary:

I agree that 'the protection and enhancement of green spaces [is] the top priority'.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5778

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Representation Summary:

All future developments must provide for garden and growing space as an initial part of the development plan with a definite designated area allocated to allotment use. It is predicted by the government that over 2.16 million homes will be without a private garden by 2010 all the more reason to plan for allotments now

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5799

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: PG Swann

Representation Summary:

Document should identify and declare the Council's 'Vision' for the long term use of Warwick Castle Park, as a major untapped recreational resource for the District's residents, and visitors. It could/should be a major 'destination' for the linear Parkway referred to in Comment (Item3b).

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5821

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Representation Summary:

Because they are planning build on existing precious open space - e.g. 1E of Plan 5 (land West of Europa Way) this is not protecting it.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5860

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Representation Summary:

We need open space for fun and food.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5935

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Representation Summary:

But it should include school playing fields.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6037

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6086

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6158

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Barry & Valerie Sankey

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Kings Hill is a valuable and rare resource close to the suburbs - its development will cause urban sprawl on a scale akin to Birmingham and Leicester.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6214

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6236

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Colin Salt

Representation Summary:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Any development should be to provide access to countryside with stiles and footpaths for rec

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6277

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6359

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6455

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Representation Summary:

No point in offering Open spaces when over 300 hectars of farmland is to be concreted!

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6561

Received: 03/11/2009

Respondent: Mrs Anita Coldman

Representation Summary:

Green Belt land has special significance and will help preserve open areas for future generations. New housing should be on areas that already have some development and/or need regeneration.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6740

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6903

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Binswood Allotment Society

Representation Summary:

As a member of the Binswood Allotment Society I am very pleased to note that
1. the importance of allotments is appreciate by WDC
2. the two alltoment sites of Northumberland Road have been excluded from the yellow areas on Plan, Potential Housing and Employment Options, Warwick, Leamington and Leamington.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7012

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Supported

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7037

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Cllr Bill Gifford

Representation Summary:

Allotment land should be excluded from any option because of its enormous amenity and ecological value. It is important that allotment land is provided as part ofnew developments and suggest there should be provision of one new allotment for every ten new houses.
Full account should be taken of ecological value of residential gardens, especially their value as wild life corridors. Strongly advocate gardens should not normally be considered for development. We note that Options for Growth document does acknowledge the ecological value of such spaces.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7069

Received: 30/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Society

Representation Summary:

Pleased that any major new development in Kenilworth will be sited away from the heritage and major green assets of the Town. However, it worth pointing out that despite facilities like Abbey Fields, the average green space per person in the town will still be less than its neighbors.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7076

Received: 29/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust

Representation Summary:

Open green spaces can contribute to an integrated green infrastructure network throughout the district. The Trust believes should these open green spaces be included within a green infrastructure network, policies focusing green infrastructure contributions from the CIL will assist in achieving this strategic objective, by providing a framework for investment to complement areas of current
open space deficit and degradation.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7146

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Friends of the Earth

Representation Summary:

Support the proposals.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7587

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7667

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Forrester of Loes Farm, Guys Cliffe

Agent: Barlow Associates Limited

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7729

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Representation Summary:

Open space is part of infrastructure. In identifying potential green field development sites, as well as identifying the number of dwellings that will be accommodated, there should be a stipulation of minimum Open Space allocation as a percentage of area. However, on brownfield sites, it may well be that existing local open space provision is underutilized or overprovided, so nothing further is required. Alternatively, if analysis shows that the existing with the new is underprovided, a levy or the old section 106 agreement, can require a contribution to allow expansion or improvement of existing facilities

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33532

Received: 15/12/2009

Respondent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

Natural England support the preparation of an infrastructure delivery plan to assist in the delivery of high quality open space and we recommend that this is linked to the provision of multi-functional green infrastructure. Natural England's green space standards state that every home should be within 300 m of an accessible natural green space of at least two hectares (ha) which is equivalent in size to two football pitches. In addition each home should also have access to: at least one accessible 20 ha site within 2 km; at least one accessible 100 ha site within 5 km and; at least one accessible 500 ha site within 10 km.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33684

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Representation Summary:

Support