Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Open Space?

Object

Representation ID: 3716

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Open Spaces sadly doesn't include the open farmland that we don't have public access to, even though we see it. Although I support the aims with respect to Parks, Gardens, Greens, Playing Fields etc, this seems pointless when we are going to surrender 300-plus hectares of green-fields to the developer's bulldozers.

Support

Representation ID: 3753

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3885

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

No

Object

Representation ID: 3913

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

so why didn't you tell us what the strategic policy approach is? This is a beautiful example of spin and should be submitted to the plain english council so they can reconsider your plain english award. It says absolutely NOTHING.

so not sure you have identified any options let alone all reasonable options! Perhaps you should try again.

Object

Representation ID: 3993

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M Abba

No, the existing open space between Heathcote (Warwick Gates) and the village of Bishops Tachbrook should be retained and not used for housing development

Comment

Representation ID: 4073

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Keith Turfrey

12.1 says it all. Open space is important. Greenbelt areas were established in the structure plans in the past. There can be no justification for eroding or eliminating them now.

Comment

Representation ID: 4081

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

The need to preserve allotments should be prioritised - in fact more land should be made available as there are waiting lists.

Support

Representation ID: 4091

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

As far as my knowledge extends.

Object

Representation ID: 4112

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Jerry Woodhouse

Presume that the rugby pitch on glasshouse lane is earmarked for housing. What about the Wardens?

Comment

Representation ID: 4154

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Woodland Trust

We would like to see the Preferred Option contain a commitment to providing accessible woodland and to using the Trust's Woodland Access Standard to inform this, particularly as part of green infrastructure delivery.

Object

Representation ID: 4203

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

The quality of life is already being reduced by the reduction of green belt land and open spaces. The preferred options will make this worse for all residents south of the river.

Support

Representation ID: 4445

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 4552

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4618

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Object

Representation ID: 4675

Received: 01/10/2009

Respondent: Mrs C Gribbon

Object to housing figure and the development of land south of Warwick, concentrating most of the development into small area.
Will result in lack of open spaces and real community value to south of Warwick.

Comment

Representation ID: 4716

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Comment

Support

Representation ID: 4723

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Object

Representation ID: 4837

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Clarke

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 4885

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Over 300 hectares of farmland is proposed to be concreted! So there is no point in offering Open Spaces.

Object

Representation ID: 4953

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs A M Sills

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of school playing fields.

Object

Representation ID: 4985

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

NO - The options are not confined to how contributions will be sought. There are also options (or should be) about what infrastructure will be needed especially in relation to the new development areas. Without the infrastructure Delivery Plan, it is impossible to reach a reasoned response to any of the proposed development areas and THIS IS A MAJOR WEAKNESS OF THE PREFERRED OPTION CONSULTATION.

Support

Representation ID: 5061

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5157

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Open spaces should remain open spaces

Object

Representation ID: 5223

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 5256

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Council planning to decimate existing open space.

Support

Representation ID: 5294

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

It is important that Open Space is properly distributed throughout the district with numerous smaller spaces in urban areas and a few large recreational areas in the countryside but within easy reach of urban dwellers.

Object

Representation ID: 5354

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 5406

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5446

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

these cannot be treated as a separate and parallel process.

Object

Representation ID: 5503

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Kirkman

Object to Kings Hill site:
People need open, green spaces for mental and physical wellbeing. Those living in village or small town live near to green spaces. For those living in Coventry it is a small but essential pleasure.