Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Open Space?

Support

Representation ID: 138

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Agreed - allotments in particular should be made sacrosanct. They tick all the boxes in terms of Green Belt, leisure provision, green objectives, health objectives, sustainability.

Object

Representation ID: 238

Received: 09/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Duncan Hurwood

No, because the council is planning to build on open green-belt sites. These should be protected, as green corridors around our built-up areas.

Object

Representation ID: 269

Received: 13/07/2009

Respondent: Mr David Jordan

If the council can satisfy the demands for affordable housing on brown field sites, then draw the line at that. If all local authorities were to do that and inform central goverment that there is no need for further housing what would they do then? There never seems to be a shortage of unaffordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 279

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Should be more specific with offer of extra space not reliant on existing parks - sounds very complacent.

Object

Representation ID: 374

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

No.

Object

Representation ID: 449

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

They say they want more open space, allotments and the health and well being of everyone. So why build on these lands? They say they want to protect - and pollution with so many extra vehicles.

Support

Representation ID: 501

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 572

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 635

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 684

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Smith

They are planning to extinguish a large amount of open space in the green belt.

Support

Representation ID: 724

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 795

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 863

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Not necessary to change if the development is stopped!

Object

Representation ID: 926

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

The plans to build 4000 homes around Warwick Gates / Whitnash areas will reduce the open space too much - no longer being a "Rural Development".

Support

Representation ID: 1008

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 1096

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

But if large housing developments are planned they should be provided with a park for the locals otherwise refuse planning permission.

Object

Representation ID: 1158

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Alice Jarrett

Warwick C.C. should be protecting the "King's Hill" block as Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 1195

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Existing open spaces, parkland, farmland should be kept and more footpaths, cycle paths opened.

Comment

Representation ID: 1196

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Existing open spaces, parkland, farmland should be kept and more footpaths and cycle paths opened.

Object

Representation ID: 1255

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

NO
Where is the evidence for provision of open space within the proposed building plans? E.g. Are WDC proposing to build a leisure centre and swimming pool by Woodside Farm? If Whitnash is - as WDC attest- an urban area, then it is not unreasonable to expect such a facility to service the increased population.

Object

Representation ID: 1320

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

No
Can we have a leisure centre/swimming pool instead of housing behind us.

Support

Representation ID: 1386

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1524

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Open Space needs to be better defined and protected.

Support

Representation ID: 1568

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

12a All future developments must provide for garden and growing space as an initial part of the development plan with a definite designated area allocated to allotment use. It is predicted by the government that over 2.16 million homes will be without a private garden by 2010 all the more reason to plan for allotments now

Object

Representation ID: 1652

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Sports ground at Lockheed, the Windmill Leamington, rugby ground and football fields (now under Sainsburys, Tiller Pin etc, etc) was the lie to any liklihood of adequate open space being provided to meet the expanded population.

Object

Representation ID: 1707

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1747

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1850

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1886

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

So many houses on green belt land is contrary to Council's own vision for Warwick District .

Object

Representation ID: 1920

Received: 14/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Cederic Box

Use brownfield sites should be developed to save limited green spaces, they are as follows, Coventry Airport area, the old Peugot site at Ryton, Ford site, and the Arches in Leamington.