(iv) Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash

Support

Representation ID: 2321

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2398

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 2437

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2531

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave

1. Would further erode Whitnash's identity as a separate community from Leamington & Sydenham.
2. Would damage historical Brook Valley area.
3. Would overload infrastructure, roads and water systems cannot take any more.
4. Would lose valuable agricultural land.
5. Other brownfield sites are better suited.

Support

Representation ID: 2623

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2684

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

No, this is intruding into a farming area and will encourage later expansioin to Radford Semele which should remain a separate village.

Support

Representation ID: 2715

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 2746

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

This is continuing development of exisiting housing areas.

Support

Representation ID: 2933

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2984

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

No objection to sympathetic housing on brown field sites

Support

Representation ID: 3043

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Katharine Whigham

Provided that the infrastructure can support this

Support

Representation ID: 3088

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3152

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 3209

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Object

Representation ID: 3272

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I object it is already a very built-up area.

Object

Representation ID: 3350

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Gill Barker

Whitnash attacked from all sides

Object

Representation ID: 3382

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Hazel Neale

Developing south of Leamington will make a sprawling suburb. Heathcote and Bishops Tachbrook will be like living in city without city ammenities. Lack of community. People will still use cars and this will make Leamington and Warwick unpopular. People will go elsewhere. Warwick Castle will lose visitors.

Object

Representation ID: 3427

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs J Morby

Object to development south of Warwick due to traffic congestion and potential increase through village of commuters heading for M40 and A46 junctions.

Object

Representation ID: 3439

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Gillian F Starkey

Object to development of Whitnash and Warwick Gates area. Public services already stretched, roads regularly congested, extensive drainage problems. Looking at infrastrucure later is back to front approach. Unless provision of schools, medical services, traffic management etc addressed and necessary improvements included, will continue to actively object.

Object

Representation ID: 3454

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

Population growth not accepted. Many east Europeans are returning home. Birth control strategies are expected to reduce UK population

Object

Representation ID: 3455

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

Population growth not accepted. Many east Europeans are returning home. Birth control strategies are expected to reduce UK population

Object

Representation ID: 3477

Received: 04/08/2009

Respondent: W R Bethall

The last of the greenfields surrounding Whitnash will have been built on over the last 40 years. During this time long standing residents have suffered from disruption due to building work and the preferred options will create further misery. Development on South Farm, the allotments, the Gas works Site and Warwick Gates has affected many due to the inadequate follow on of infrastructure and because of problems with flooding. How many dwellings will be built on the Woodside Farm site, if as rumoured it is 250 where would traffic enter and exit the site? Would a developer be required to provide access onto the Harbury Lane or would it be via Landor Road? Traffic on Landor Road, Ashford Road and access onto the Tachbrook Road is already a nightmare at peak times and needless to say this development will further add to the choked road systems.

Object

Representation ID: 3484

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Bolland

The objections hinge on the health hazards posed by the proximity of a busy main line railway to this site and the loss of an undeveloped gateway to open countryside for Whitnash residents.

The prevailing winds carry exhaust particulates from the trains and brake dust to the site and this coupled with the mist that often hangs over the area on cold mornings seems to me to constitute a health hazard.

There is also the question of maintaining buffer zones between Leamington, Whitnash and Radford Semele.

Object

Representation ID: 3500

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Horsley

Land South of Sydenham Main objection that strategy hinges primarily on unquantifiable values which would do significant harm to Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook. Whitnash has had massive development in Warwick Gates turning it into amorphous mass.Latest proposals threaten greater loss of identity, community.
Land rejected for development by LP Inspector - what has changed? Even if Inspectors findings relevant only to 2011, they should not be disregarded. WDC has responsibility to to preserve green environment. Infrastructure already strained. Further increases in population would have further unpleasant impact. Roads are choked at certain times of day, schools are at bursting point, doctors and dentists already over-subscribed. No need for industrial units as employers are moving out not in. People will travel to work where their skills are needed

Object

Representation ID: 3535

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: R.F. Garner

Land east of Whitnash

Object

Representation ID: 3544

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Chris and Pauline Vaughan

Object for the following reasons:
Increased traffic, lack of infrstructure, access to Warwick hospital, increased pollution leading to loss of quality of life, enbough new housing built over last 15 years - who will live there? Need to use brownfield land first. Free homes by building halls of residence at University; ask villages if housing needed for first time buyers allowing them to stay in their own area. Land at Finham should be used to meet Warwick's housing requirement.

Object

Representation ID: 3552

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jean Drew

Not only detrimental to residents of Bishops Tachbrook, Whitnash and Warwick Gates, but also to residents of Warwick and Leamington Spa
Infrastructure:already inadequate
Water supply: poor pressure in Bishops Tachbrook after Warwick Gates built so Severn Trent had to build new pumping station.
Sewers: inadequate for village. Sewage flows into fardens onto Oakley Wood Road when torrential rain falls occur
Surface Drainage: flooding occurs on Oakley Wood Road where is crosses Tach Brook - more houses will increase problem along Tach Brook valley
Roads:
Congestion at peak times will worsen as will pollution. Traffic will increase through Bishops Tachbrook adding to speeding problems
Education: Not enough primary school places now. If more children have to travel to school, traffic will increase. Children at school outside area decreases social development of community.
Services: Police and doctors stretched now and will come under more pressure. Emergency vehicles will have to contend with congested bridges across rivers in Leamington and Warwick
Green Belt Land: In direct contradiction to Govt. policy to make Britain self sufficient in food production
Vision: Loss of village identity would contradict vision
Employment: Will be few jobs for new residents. Why build on green belt land for people to travel elsewhere to work?
Do not appear to have taken account of public opinion on options consultation when majority chose south of Coventry.
Additional housing could be located in villages, where needed.
Look for brown field sites

Object

Representation ID: 3553

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jean Drew

Not only detrimental to residents of Bishops Tachbrook, Whitnash and Warwick Gates, but also to residents of Warwick and Leamington Spa
Infrastructure:already inadequate
Water supply: poor pressure in Bishops Tachbrook after Warwick Gates built so Severn Trent had to build new pumping station.
Sewers: inadequate for village. Sewage flows into fardens onto Oakley Wood Road when torrential rain falls occur
Surface Drainage: flooding occurs on Oakley Wood Road where is crosses Tach Brook - more houses will increase problem along Tach Brook valley
Roads:
Congestion at peak times will worsen as will pollution. Traffic will increase through Bishops Tachbrook adding to speeding problems
Education: Not enough primary school places now. If more children have to travel to school, traffic will increase. Children at school outside area decreases social development of community.
Services: Police and doctors stretched now and will come under more pressure. Emergency vehicles will have to contend with congested bridges across rivers in Leamington and Warwick
Green Belt Land: In direct contradiction to Govt. policy to make Britain self sufficient in food production
Vision: Loss of village identity would contradict vision
Employment: Will be few jobs for new residents. Why build on green belt land for people to travel elsewhere to work?
Do not appear to have taken account of public opinion on options consultation when majority chose south of Coventry.
Additional housing could be located in villages, where needed.
Look for brown field sites

Object

Representation ID: 3581

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jean Shaddick

Anti-social behaviour results from large estates of houses. Infrastructure is not in place to deal with development. Traffic problems, especially with getting to Warwick hospital and ambulances will take longer through extra traffic. Told not to increase flood risk by not concreting over gardens.
Will need land to grow our own food in future.
Area around Harbury Lane easy target but it will ruin attractive place to live. Heritage sites of Warwick and Leamington should not be allowed to become like Coventry, Rugby and suburbs of Birmingham

Object

Representation ID: 3618

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs D H Cowgill

No need for further housing, schools full, doctors, dentists, police services stretched. Commercial sites remain empty so where will people find employment. Already two major developments on last few years at South farm and Warwick Gates overloading services in Whitnash. Good agricultural land needed. South of Sydnenham site and east of Whitnash is next to Whitnash Brook Valley Nature reserve with wildlife in evidence.