(iv) Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 1144

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1735

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Representation Summary:

Due to loss of green belt/space, rural life and quality of life for elderly residents on Heathcote Park, Harbury Lane.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1765

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1824

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1861

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Representation Summary:

Not sure of land south of Sydenham but again same reasons as previously.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1939

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

Representation Summary:

Too many houses already.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1991

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: K A Ferguson

Representation Summary:

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodatehousing needs over the next 18 years.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2005

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: A. J Daubnley

Representation Summary:

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18 ears.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2016

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18

years.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2026

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Pritchard

Representation Summary:


We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2107

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: J Wenzel

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2115

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2117

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis

Representation Summary:

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2123

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in

the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2138

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S P Jones

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2142

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S P Jones

Representation Summary:

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2150

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: D E Alderson

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2159

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2161

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2172

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2179

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Keefe family

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2183

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Representation Summary:

Further expansion onto greenfield sites is objected to.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2220

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Lane

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2230

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: A B Partridge

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2240

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2252

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2261

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2272

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Pye

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2284

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S Shanahan

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2286

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S Shanahan

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2300

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Wiles

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.