(iv) Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1735
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni
Due to loss of green belt/space, rural life and quality of life for elderly residents on Heathcote Park, Harbury Lane.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1765
Received: 20/08/2009
Respondent: Max Bacon
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1824
Received: 28/08/2009
Respondent: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1861
Received: 31/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham
Not sure of land south of Sydenham but again same reasons as previously.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1939
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson
Too many houses already.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1991
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: K A Ferguson
On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodatehousing needs over the next 18 years.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2005
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: A. J Daubnley
On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses
proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18 ears.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2016
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses
proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18
years.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2026
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: G Pritchard
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2107
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: J Wenzel
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2115
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2117
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2123
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in
the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2138
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: S P Jones
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2142
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: S P Jones
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2150
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: D E Alderson
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2159
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2161
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2172
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2179
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Keefe family
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2183
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles
Further expansion onto greenfield sites is objected to.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2220
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: G Lane
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2230
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: A B Partridge
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2240
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2252
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2261
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: M Weeks
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2272
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Pye
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2284
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: S Shanahan
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2286
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: S Shanahan
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2300
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: M Wiles
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.