(iv) Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash

Support

Representation ID: 126

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Support

Object

Representation ID: 160

Received: 07/07/2009

Respondent: mr graham brown

South Sydenham has had more than its fair share of development already.The area to be concreted is prime farmland.At a time when this country can't feed itself and the UN has released figures putting the number of people offficialy hungry at more than one billion for the first time and food riots a recent memory it would be an act of crass stupidity to build on arable land.It is a fact self evident that growth cannot continue forever so I hope the council will have the courage to make a stand and suspend any new housing developments.

Support

Representation ID: 188

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

I support all the suggested options as they focus housing on areas best able to accommodate new development, without encroaching on the Green Belt.

Support

Representation ID: 189

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

I support all the suggested options as they focus housing on areas best able to accommodate new development, without encroaching on the Green Belt.

Support

Representation ID: 190

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

I support all the suggested options as they focus housing on areas best able to accommodate new development, without encroaching on the Green Belt.

Support

Representation ID: 212

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter

Again, more scope for housing here, new houses have not long been built so it won't disturb people too much and shops and schools in plenty

Object

Representation ID: 263

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 331

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

A suitable area for further development.

Support

Representation ID: 359

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 407

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Suitable location for expansion of the urban area

Support

Representation ID: 437

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 488

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 558

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 622

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 711

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Access not easy.

Support

Representation ID: 782

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 850

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Object

Support

Representation ID: 914

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 990

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1081

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Limited. Connected to local employment.

Support

Representation ID: 1116

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

An area which would benefit greatly from investment.

Object

Representation ID: 1182

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Object

Object

Representation ID: 1239

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

There would be more concentration on merging Whitnash/ Leamington/ Radford Semele. Whitnash is a separate community - Keep it separate.
Lots of houses recently built at Chesterton Heights/ Pebble Island spoiling a beautiful environment. Houses not selling

Object

Representation ID: 1306

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Radford Semele is at risk of merging. Whitnash is at risk of more sprawl.

Object

Representation ID: 1405

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs John and Mary Fletcher

Number of people: 2

Object to the development which will overload existing struggling infrastructure. The construction of 2500 houses will lead to destruction of Tachbrook Valley, loss of countryside, overcrowded services and overburdened infrastructure. Loss of character and distinctiveness of area.

Support the need for more housing but only in sustainable location which protect the greenbelt

Would to see housing growth dispersed through villages and brownfield land sites

Object

Representation ID: 1422

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs N&M Woods

Number of people: 2

Proposing housing will overload existing services/ infrastructure, unacceptable loss of rural landscapes, loss of distinctiveness and character of Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook.

Object

Representation ID: 1424

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs N&M Woods

Number of people: 2

Proposing housing will overload existing services/ infrastructure, unacceptable loss of rural landscapes, loss of distinctiveness and character of Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook.

Object

Representation ID: 1634

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

very strong objections. Here's & Harbury Lane house proposals will completely OBLITERATE Whitnash as a separate community.

Object

Representation ID: 1642

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Vanessa Hickerton

Alarmed at the number and cost to environment of houses being built adjacent to Campion School. Habitats will be damaged if development goes ahead so close to the bridlepath. Concern at where the building will eventually finish in this area. This will damage rural roots Whitnash once had.

Object

Representation ID: 1689

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.