(iii) Land at Warwickshire College, Leamington

Support

Representation ID: 5392

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5524

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5655

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5764

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5847

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5892

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Extra housing would again lead to more traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 5920

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Should be kept for educational use.

Support

Representation ID: 5996

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6073

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6188

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6257

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Agreed

Support

Representation ID: 6344

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6389

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ed & Zoe Rycroft

Number of people: 2

Development at this end of Princes Drive would cause additional traffic problems for those travelling between Warwick and Leamington which is already a nightmare at the moment.

Object

Representation ID: 6442

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

But prefer student accommodation in this instance, to free up multi-occupancy houses elsewhere in Leamington - target 500 minimum.

Support

Representation ID: 6694

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Comment

Representation ID: 6764

Received: 06/11/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Commissioning, Planning & Partnerships Service, Children, Young People & Families]

The nearest primary school is Brookhurst Primary School which is full and there is forecast to be no surplus primary school places in this area when this site is developed. The development would require 59 primary school places, and would probably be provided through the expansion of one of the existing schools.

Early Years provision will also be required, totalling 8 fte places.

This development would generate 42 additional secondary school places. A further, 10 post 16 places will also be required.

Support

Representation ID: 6869

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Binswood Allotment Society

support

Support

Representation ID: 6938

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Land at Warwickshire College
We agree with the preferred option at 300 homes.

Support

Representation ID: 6997

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Supported

Support

Representation ID: 7557

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

support

Object

Representation ID: 7639

Received: 14/12/2009

Respondent: Mr Boyle

Agent: Brown and Co

In terms of land allocations, we do feel that insufficient consideration has been given to the wider regional picture and that too much details is provided on the strategic sites. We feel that there are other more suitable sites available and that at this stage the plan should be more general in terms of its direction for growth without site specific details being put forward. If these are not deliverable, as we understand has yet to be proved, then the plan may generally not be deliverable and sustainable.

Support

Representation ID: 7708

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

I agree with the preferred option at 300 homes

Object

Representation ID: 33580

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Revelan Group

Agent: Harris Lamb

It is premature to allocate land for development until a comparative site assessment is undertaken based on a robust evidence base.

Support

Representation ID: 33925

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Supports location