(iii) Land at Warwickshire College, Leamington

Support

Representation ID: 2622

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2683

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Yes provided here is room left for the college's expansion.

Object

Representation ID: 2714

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Warwickshire College is a major provider of employment and has potential to expand. It already caters for overseas students for whom onsite accomodation is a significant factor in choice.

Support

Representation ID: 2745

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

In moderation. How much more housing can be built here in addition to the student accommodation blocks currently being built?

Support

Representation ID: 2932

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2983

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

No objection to sympathetic housing on brown field sites

Support

Representation ID: 3042

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Katharine Whigham

provision of sufficient and suitable accomosdationwithin walking ditsnace of town and accessible

Support

Representation ID: 3087

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3151

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 3208

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Support

Representation ID: 3271

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Comment

Representation ID: 3452

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

Do not understand where - is the college to close or move?

Support

Representation ID: 3649

Received: 15/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

support

Support

Representation ID: 3668

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

support

Support

Representation ID: 3703

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Encourage this to be brought forward to re-balance the phasing in favour of brown field sites.

Support

Representation ID: 3878

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

This ties in better with the council strategy of building communities, town centre growth and providing affordable housing than many of their other preferred sites.

Support

Representation ID: 3953

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

An appriopriate site as part of a balanced provision of housing to meet identified needs

Support

Representation ID: 4047

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Support again already in the town area

Support

Representation ID: 4179

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Brownfield Site

Support

Representation ID: 4238

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Object

Representation ID: 4258

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Good re-use of brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 4534

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Ideal location for further education.

Support

Representation ID: 4596

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4867

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Prefer student accomodation in this area to free up homes elsewhere in Leamington

Support

Representation ID: 4947

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Qualified YES - - It is impossible to give a reasoned response without knowing the infrastructure implications etc.

Support

Representation ID: 5047

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5130

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 5203

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

support

Support

Representation ID: 5207

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5341

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Proposed housing density to be increased