(iii) Land at Warwickshire College, Leamington

Support

Representation ID: 262

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Central location.

Object

Representation ID: 358

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 395

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Canon David Tilley

support

Comment

Representation ID: 406

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

I think site can accommodate some housing but less than in the current proposal

Support

Representation ID: 436

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 487

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

I am assuming that this is student accommodation.

Support

Representation ID: 557

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 621

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 710

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 781

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 849

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Support brown field development

Support

Representation ID: 913

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 986

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1079

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Land used be kept for future college expansion.

Support

Representation ID: 1114

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1181

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1238

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1305

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1633

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Same comments apply as for above

Support

Representation ID: 1687

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1734

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1764

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1823

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1855

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

As before need traffic impact survey etc.

Object

Representation ID: 1938

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

Not practical

Support

Representation ID: 2182

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2320

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2397

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 2436

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2589

Received: 13/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Clarke

Subject to trafiic volume assessment and retention of suitable education facilities for now and the future