(i) Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington

Support

Representation ID: 3450

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

Good use of derelict land.

Support

Representation ID: 3526

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Horsley

Use up areas that have been derelict for years such as Queensway, Old Ford Foundry, Station Approach upper floors of empty shops.

Support

Representation ID: 3647

Received: 15/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

But with the caveat that there may be a need to introduce a major north- south trunk road (ie. an extension of Europa Way northwards) to cater for any housing development in the Harbury area.

Support

Representation ID: 3666

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

support

Support

Representation ID: 3701

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Increase the density of housing - require the developer to put in more mitigating measures to develop the site fully.

Comment

Representation ID: 3785

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Steve Hunt

The housing element of this site should be reconsidered and substantially increased.

Object

Representation ID: 3872

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

Until the council can provide better figures for converting this land to housing vs keeping it as employment it does not make strategic sense to convert this to housing and turn green fields to industrial.

Support

Representation ID: 3873

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

former disused sites would be better and less terrible than using the beauty spot at Kings Hill.

Support

Representation ID: 3935

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

Agree, but land would need a lot of cleaning to make it safe.

Support

Representation ID: 3951

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

An appriopriate site as part of a balanced provision of housing to meet identified needs

Support

Representation ID: 4042

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Yes

Support

Representation ID: 4045

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Support as this is not GB

Object

Representation ID: 4140

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Andy Robb

Redevelop as employment land and not housing.

Support

Representation ID: 4177

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Brownfield Site

Support

Representation ID: 4255

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Good re-use of brownfield land.

Support

Representation ID: 4531

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4594

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Comment

Representation ID: 4668

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Better used for industry particularly in light of recent events in Corby (Housing built on old steel works).

Support

Representation ID: 4808

Received: 18/10/2009

Respondent: Ian Frost

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4943

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Qualified YES - - It is impossible to give a reasoned response without knowing the infrastructure implications etc.

Support

Representation ID: 5045

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

This is how the housing requirement should be solved

Support

Representation ID: 5128

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Brown field / rejuvenation of existing areas.

Support

Representation ID: 5184

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

support

Support

Representation ID: 5204

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5339

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Far too much valuable farmland is proposed for development. There has been insufficient analysis of existing redevelopment sites. Proposed densities for the proposed town centre sites are too low.
The towns will become unbalanced with too much development to the south.

Support

Representation ID: 5390

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5522

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5624

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: PG Swann

help to maintain the present economy of the District by; Stopping the trend (for now) of allowing the redevelopment of exisitng employment premises/sites. The level of housing provision is unlikely to be matched by the level of requisite employment provision.
Please do not overload town centres, they are already under stress, and sites are limited. Put more emphasis on linking job creation in the comprehensive growth areas, and not just in the ubiquitous 'mixed use' designation - consider dedicated site(s) closely associated with those new preferred housing allocations.

Support

Representation ID: 5653

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5762

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Subject to the land being fit to build on - given toxic waste concerns expressed by others.