(i) Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1685
Received: 27/08/2009
Respondent: J.G Whetstone
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1732
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1762
Received: 20/08/2009
Respondent: Max Bacon
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1820
Received: 28/08/2009
Respondent: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1848
Received: 31/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham
As before need traffic impact survey etc.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1936
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson
Subject to environmental clearance.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2318
Received: 21/07/2009
Respondent: S B Hoyles
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2371
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: MR Ben Blackham
I support this proposal. I feel that it is imperative that countryside and arable land are protected where ever possible.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2395
Received: 04/09/2009
Respondent: Roy Standley
Yes.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2434
Received: 08/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Connolly
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2587
Received: 13/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Richard Clarke
A good proposal
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2598
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: Richard Storey
Query extent of remedial work needed to eliminate industrial pollution.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2620
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: John Arnold
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2681
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt
Yes but please build something of distinction at the gateway to the town.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2711
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2743
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: Pauline Neale
This should be kept as land for employment uses so that those living in Leamington have more opportunities for work.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2835
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2874
Received: 11/09/2009
Respondent: Susan Butcher
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2930
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2981
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill
No objection to building on brown field sites.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3035
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Rhyan Barry
This site has lain dormant for over two years. It is on the corner of a main roadway into Leamington. This gives the impression of a shabby town and will have nothing for the tourist industry.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3040
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Katharine Whigham
provided infrastructure is looked at I would support this
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3054
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Dr Russell Moseley
I would support maximum use of brown field sites.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3060
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Alison Oliver
An excellent oppotunity for re development
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3085
Received: 17/09/2000
Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3150
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: John Murphy
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3206
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw
No building on North Leamington Allotments
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3269
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: Mr David John Bowers
I support it.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3360
Received: 17/09/2009
Respondent: Christopher Gibb
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3397
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs M Kane
Support