Do you agree with the preferred hierarchy and strategy for each of the District's town and local centres?

Support

Representation ID: 3948

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

the preferred hierarchy is appropriate

Support

Representation ID: 4024

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Can't disagree with such words.

Support

Representation ID: 4031

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Support the prefered options

Object

Representation ID: 4241

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Any additional retail parks should be sited to the North of Leamington or close to Kenilworth, thus reducing traffic through Leamington & Warwick town centres, by residents of these areas travelling to the shire retail parks

Support

Representation ID: 4359

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Support

Object

Representation ID: 4522

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4587

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4661

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Generally agree, Kenilworth Talisman Square needs to be finished!! Business rates need to be favourable.

Object

Representation ID: 4858

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

No mention of people living in town centres - we need people living in the centres to ensure long term vitality and would help in reduction of travelling and pollution.

Support

Representation ID: 4886

Received: 07/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Yes

Support

Representation ID: 5032

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5120

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

No green field development, only brown field or rejuvenation of existing areas.

Support

Representation ID: 5153

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

support

Object

Representation ID: 5162

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

Plenty of accommodation already.

Object

Representation ID: 5193

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 5276

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

The hierarchy suggested is the natural based on the relative sizes of the towns and their needs. The policy should not, however be used to limit developments which may be seen to be outside these 'natural' leavels.

Object

Representation ID: 5331

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

The strategy for Leamington town centre needs to be clearer on its approach to dealing with the underperformance and should set out the options more clearly for sites for retail development.

Support

Representation ID: 5382

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5383

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 5431

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Don't know, it is not in the document. In principle it is fine.

Object

Representation ID: 5470

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Don't agree with the Chandos Street development and the excessive emphasis on retailing in Leamington.

Support

Representation ID: 5514

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5516

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5570

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5645

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5692

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5754

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5839

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5882

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Object

Object

Representation ID: 5884

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Visitor numbers would decline to come with inadequate parking.