Do you agree with the preferred hierarchy and strategy for each of the District's town and local centres?

Object

Representation ID: 1911

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft

Whilst some re-generation is needed within some areas of Leamington mostly south of the river, Any new development will be the typical cheap easy to build eyesores that have ruined many a town centre before.

Most of the buildings in the 3 towns are period buildings with great heritage and character...this is what attracts people to the area. We're not Milton Keynes or Nuneaton where any old building will do. We're talkling about a Historical Spa towns that are aspirational places to come to, live and visit, and NOT the average town centre.

Support

Representation ID: 1930

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Object

Representation ID: 1976

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ken Hope

(6.b) Please see previous comments re paragraphs 6.2 and 6.14 - 6.16.

Object

Representation ID: 2044

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.

and insufficient research and consultation at local level.

Object

Representation ID: 2045

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

lack of research and insufficient consideration of views of local people.

Support

Representation ID: 2071

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

With regard to Warwick the proposals seem sensible

Comment

Representation ID: 2099

Received: 06/09/2009

Respondent: Nick Booker

Kenilworth needs to build on its niche position by developing for example specialist high quality shops - it beggars belief that given the relative affluence of the town there is neither a good kitchen/cook shop nor an antiques shop. It does have a a re-vitalised book shop in Talisman Sq and one can only it hope survives in a very competitive book market and it has two picture framing/picture gallery shops . Some how critical mass needs to be built but not in terms of the usual well known brand names that we can access elsewhere.

Comment

Representation ID: 2149

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

The character and appeal of Warwick and Leamington Spa will be ruined by allowing continual expansion. The surrounding villages are put under great pressures by such plans.

Object

Representation ID: 2310

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2426

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2487

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Leamington Station area is ripe for new office development, which should be linked into cycling and walking routes along the towpath from Warwick and the surrounding villages to the office and retail jobs and station. The area plan should deliver the identified strategic objectives against an area action plan/site allocation for Leamington centre.

BW would wish preserve the rural nature of the Hatton Flight if so then the movement of development towards Hatton would need to be sympathetic in design, with supportive infrastructure towards Warwick Parkway and the urban centers linking into the canal towpaths for sustainable movement.

Object

Representation ID: 2529

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave

Just sounds like your strategy is to have a plan for a strategy, no substance, nothing concrete to agree to. Need to consult with people outside of 3 largest towns.

Object

Representation ID: 2550

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

KENILWORTH - already has a thriving economy. Emphasis needs to be placed on attracting retail/business opportunities to the existing vacant units in the town.

Support

Representation ID: 2612

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2671

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2697

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 2735

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Site allocations must be carefully made to maximise the use of currently empty retail premises. Abolishing newly introduced parking charges would encourage local shoppers to spend longer in town centres supporting local retailers.

Object

Representation ID: 2829

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2868

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 3031

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Rhyan Barry

I believe that there must be regeneration within our town centres but not at the cost of our countryside. Empty shops make a town look run down of which there are many in all the towns so there should be no need to build more offices. The lack of shoppers has not been helped by the council introducing parking metres on every nearby street. People need to be encouraged to come to the town centres not discouraged.

Object

Representation ID: 3077

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Object

Support

Representation ID: 3200

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Object

Representation ID: 3261

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

As above 6a

Support

Representation ID: 3388

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3473

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

object

Object

Representation ID: 3561

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Support

Representation ID: 3603

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Sport England

We think this is a sound approach.

Support

Representation ID: 3693

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Yes

Object

Representation ID: 3845

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

You seem to be Warwick Dichotomy Council. This is a contradiction to the preferred growth strategy. You don't want traffic moving towards the town centre for one argument and then suggest developing the town centre supports the local economy. You seem to want people to live and work in Warwick Gates and beyond but you don't want them travelling into the town centre, as you are only developing this for the people who do live in the town centre. This objective should be focused on giving Warwick Gates a community something you have denied them for far too long.

Object

Representation ID: 3864

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

I suggest that there could be many other areas that could be far more useful than Kenilworth/Coventry area. Are we being able to become a Warwick District initiatve?