Do you agree with the preferred hierarchy and strategy for each of the District's town and local centres?

Support

Representation ID: 116

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Agreed

Object

Representation ID: 208

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter

No.

Comment

Representation ID: 321

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Supported in general but Warwick already has a problem with traffic which must deter potential visitors. A one way system through the Town might help but cars are not going to go away and this issue must be addressed.

Object

Representation ID: 348

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

No.

Support

Representation ID: 426

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 477

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

My only concerns are associated with Leamington's shopping development. Large multi-national chains are unlikely to be investing in the immediate future - there are already several potential sites which are unoccupied at present.

Support

Representation ID: 547

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 599

Received: 03/08/2009

Respondent: B A Alston

No new development should be permitted while large number of existing premises rermain empty. e.g in Leamington the existing ex Lee Longlands site should be redeveloped before any new shopping arcades are permitted

Object

Representation ID: 609

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 671

Received: 06/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Susan Edkins

in warwick no development of shopping facilities is needed

Object

Representation ID: 672

Received: 06/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Susan Edkins

no

Support

Representation ID: 700

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 771

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 839

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

No need to expand town centres, just improve

Support

Representation ID: 903

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 969

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Support

Representation ID: 987

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1067

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1069

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1171

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Support

Comment

Representation ID: 1229

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

No- 6.14 - Out of town retail parks /parking charges/high cost of public transport = Dozens of empty shops and offices in Leamington Spa. The town is typically quiet- people are shopping elsewhere.

Object

Representation ID: 1294

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Shires retail park/ parking charges, expensive buses make Leamington very quiet. Lots of empty shops and offices.
People are going to other places to shop because Leamington is unfriendly, expensive and derelict.

Support

Representation ID: 1362

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

It is understood that the hierarchy is that Leamington Spa is on its own as a strategic centre and a focus for major growth. Then the town centres of Warwick and Kenilworth fall within the next tier down as 'other town centres' where growth is at a level that meets local needs. Below these town centres there is a network of local centres or shopping parades where growth should meet the day-to-day needs of the area. We fully support this hierarchy to town centres.

Object

Representation ID: 1477

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1622

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

You will just choke the centres and will onlly produce a mass of buildings detrimental to the separate identity of Leamington Spa and Warwick.

Object

Representation ID: 1674

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1708

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

More residential consultation should happen.

Support

Representation ID: 1811

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1832

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Not aware of all options.

Object

Representation ID: 1834

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Not enough known about it. Not enough information in the public domain.