(ii) Land west of Europa Way, Warwick

Showing comments and forms 91 to 107 of 107

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6243

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Representation Summary:

Good location

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6303

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

Representation Summary:

Empty units can be utilised. The old ford site can be used also instead of building more units and the industrial sprawl over the image and historic value of Warwick.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6325

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Representation Summary:

Sufficient current land bank to meet needs in the timescale.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6428

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Representation Summary:

This should be retained as a green gap between Warwick and Leamington Spa. Housing and industrial development on this site will gridlock Europa Way and the 'Sainsburys' roundabout - with serious ramifications for Myton Road and Princes Drive.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6679

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Representation Summary:

support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6706

Received: 05/11/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Heritage & Culture (Museums)

Representation Summary:

Land west of Europa Way, Warwick:
The Warwickshire Historic Environment Record indicates the presence of archaeological sites, including cropmarks of unknown date. Historic Landscape Characterisation indicates an area of planned enclosure and large post-war fields.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6925

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Land West of Europa Way
The Parish Council would support development of this site only on the condition that all other all other employment land in the district has been fully developed and has a high occupancy. Hence, Phase 1 should only consist of brownfield developments and this site should not enter the programme before Phase 2 or even Phase 3. By that time, it will be possible to verify the current population estimates for that time period to confirm whether further expansion is justified or not.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6984

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Supported.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7388

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Europa Way Consortium

Agent: Entec UK Ltd

Representation Summary:

The Europa Way Consortium supports the identification of Land West of Europa Way as a location for new employment land.

The Consortium views employment use as a key component of a mixed use development scheme. The site is well located to the strategic road network, is close to neighbouring employment uses and is available to come forward for part-employment use in the short term.

Opportunities for employment include potential extension to the Warwick Technology Park; opportunities may also exist in the northern portion of the site and will be shortly considered through a comprehensive masterplan.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7539

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7566

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Framptons

Representation Summary:

Support, this is a suitable location for some additional employment land as part of a comprehensive scheme for the overall land allocation.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7632

Received: 14/12/2009

Respondent: Mr Boyle

Agent: Brown and Co

Representation Summary:

In terms of land allocations, we do feel that insufficient consideration has been given to the wider regional picture and that too much details is provided on the strategic sites. We feel that there are other more suitable sites available and that at this stage the plan should be more general in terms of its direction for growth without site specific details being put forward. If these are not deliverable, as we understand has yet to be proved, then the plan may generally not be deliverable and sustainable.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7657

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Forrester of Loes Farm, Guys Cliffe

Agent: Barlow Associates Limited

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33574

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Revelan Group

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

Do not believe the Council has sufficient information to allocate land for development at this stage. The evidence base is not robust enough to establish the most appropriate locations for growth.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33750

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33785

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Hancock Town Planning

Representation Summary:

The land at Old Budbrooke Road offers the following potential advantages which are not offered by this site:

- Much of the site is previously developed land;
- The site has little agricultural value;
- The site is not part of the wider landscape;
- Highly sustainable location within easy walking distance of Warwick Parkway;
- Easy pedestrian access to Warwick/Leamington via the canal;
- Well screened from Old Budbrooke Road by existing vegetation;
- Access can be gained from the site frontage.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33816

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Representation Summary:

Insufficient work has been done to date to be certain that the Preferred Options can accommodate the housing numbers and infrastructure. The Core Strategy should therefore contain flexibility to allow for the appropriate planning of the area, and therefore suggest the inclusion of the land south of Gallows Hill as an employment option.

If it was inappropriate to put employment on the Preferred Option sites it would provide some flexibility. It could also accommodate elements of social infrastructure serving other growth areas.

Do not accept that the development of the land would affect the setting of Castle Park.